Game Thread 2024 CHL vs Ntdp Game 2 | Page 4 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Game Thread 2024 CHL vs Ntdp Game 2

This should be the result for reasons people mentioned above. What would be expected from a Junior A vs MJ/CHL lineup.

World juniors are only the true best on best, hence why the Canada/USA games are so good/close in that tournament.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deep Blue Metallic
This should be the result for reasons people mentioned above. What would be expected from a Junior A vs MJ/CHL lineup.

World juniors are only the true best on best, hence why the Canada/USA games are so good/close in that tournament.
The problem with World Juniors or any of the intl tourneys is there's always an excuse. For juniors, it's usually the guys in the show. With that, it's not truly best on best and historical the Olympics is about it for that.
 
The problem with World Juniors or any of the intl tourneys is there's always an excuse. For juniors, it's usually the guys in the show. With that, it's not truly best on best and historical the Olympics is about it for that.
Which is what made the 2005 World Juniors so special.
 
Like who are you thinking? There’s no other draft eligibles that are good enough. This is a bad year for the Americans top to bottom.
Rombach would definitely help. He'll go somewhere between 25-55 in the draft. Also, Cooper Simpson for sure. More skilled than virtually every player on the NTDP.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jtechkid
Rombach fiddler and probably 2-3 others dmen could have made that team plus about 4-6 forwards - lot of head scratches on picks.
 
Seems pretty unfair that the CHL team has late-birthday players but not the USA because it's the NTDP.

It would have been great to watch Hagens against Martone, Schaefer and Misa. In the end it's only bad for Hagens, because his draft stock remains the same while the others might gain popularity with this showcase. I would not be surprised if we start seeing public rankings with Hagens at 4th.
 
Seems pretty unfair that the CHL team has late-birthday players but not the USA because it's the NTDP.

It would have been great to watch Hagens against Martone, Schaefer and Misa. In the end it's only bad for Hagens, because his draft stock remains the same while the others might gain popularity with this showcase. I would not be surprised if we start seeing public rankings with Hagens at 4th.
the Ntdp practices and played together for almost 18 months that should have had a large advantage over CHL team - no excuses it was embarrassing! hopefully better next game .
 
I think a lot of people saw this coming from a mile away when this was announced. Weak year for the NTDP, made not sense to not just have USHL all stars (mainly NTPD anyways but take the help)
Why give the Americans the benefit of winning a world championship by gaining experience.
Have the USA put in the their best draft team age group and not play into their B team. Not saying they would lose every game by playing team defence but this experiment can be much better structured
 
the Ntdp practices and played together for almost 18 months that should have had a large advantage over CHL team - no excuses it was embarrassing! hopefully better next game .
Not an excuse. Just a fact.

Being part of a team doesn’t make them distinctly better.

Older almost always beats younger when talking about teenagers. It’s not to say the age gap is unrecoverable, but the point of the poster is that being on average 1/3 to 1/2 a year younger than your competition tends to matter more than chemistry with teenagers.
 
Rombach would definitely help. He'll go somewhere between 25-55 in the draft. Also, Cooper Simpson for sure. More skilled than virtually every player on the NTDP.
That’s true, Rombach is a solid player and I didn’t mind Simpson at the Hlinka. But I doubt either of those guys make much of a difference here. That game was boys vs men and the skill difference was stark.
 
Not an excuse. Just a fact.

Being part of a team doesn’t make them distinctly better.

Older almost always beats younger when talking about teenagers. It’s not to say the age gap is unrecoverable, but the point of the poster is that being on average 1/3 to 1/2 a year younger than your competition tends to matter more than chemistry with teenagers.
The age differences here as so marginal it shouldn’t even be a talking point. Especially when you look at the ncaa this season. The best players are all junior aged and eligible. Skill will always overcome a slight age difference. USA hockey has an issue at the youth level, it’s the same 7-10 programs in the Natty’s every year. They need to focus on depth. USA hockey has come a long way, I don’t disagree with that, but it’s still true they can’t really compete after their top guys. Canada could throw 3 teams at the WJC this year from these age groups and all compete for gold.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FLAMESFAN
USA hockey has an issue at the youth level, it’s the same 7-10 programs in the Natty’s every year. They need to focus on depth. USA hockey has come a long way, I don’t disagree with that, but it’s still true they can’t really compete after their top guys. Canada could throw 3 teams at the WJC this year from these age groups and all compete for gold.
Hockey is a regional sport in America that even then is played mostly by kids who have familial connections to the sport who even then have the means to pony up for the associated costs of youth hockey in the US. The talent pool USA hockey is drawing from is always going to be relatively shallow compared to the one in Canada.
 
Hockey is a regional sport in America that even then is played mostly by kids who have familial connections to the sport who even then have the means to pony up for the associated costs of youth hockey in the US. The talent pool USA hockey is drawing from is always going to be relatively shallow compared to the one in Canada.
That's fair but you have to remember, posters dump on the CHL all the time so we need to enjoy this moment.

Am I the only one who is not quite invested in this so much as some sort of Canada vs USA “measuring stick” and rather just enjoying a bunch of 2025 prospects on the ice together?

Or am I just coping as an American? :laugh:

 
Last edited:
The age differences here as so marginal it shouldn’t even be a talking point. Especially when you look at the ncaa this season. The best players are all junior aged and eligible. Skill will always overcome a slight age difference. USA hockey has an issue at the youth level, it’s the same 7-10 programs in the Natty’s every year. They need to focus on depth. USA hockey has come a long way, I don’t disagree with that, but it’s still true they can’t really compete after their top guys. Canada could throw 3 teams at the WJC this year from these age groups and all compete for gold.
Of course it’s a fair talking point. Doesn’t mean the USA team would be better, but it adds to why the CHL is simply better.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad