Chinaski89
Registered User
- May 17, 2019
- 944
- 1,430
Let's get two like that for next yearBoy it's nice to have a goalie that doesn't turn every chance into a disaster.
How come Kovalenko was benched for so long earlier? Is it known? He seemed fine this game.
Wennberg is a stud only in #BookTokOkay, Wennberg is mostly a stud. Even the Handsome fail sometimes.
Celebrini is great at reading opportunities arising from other teams' reactions, so a player that can jump on a puck and make the other team react is a huge boon to him. Smith and Toffoli can't do that but Kovalenko can when he's on his horse.Something about trying to play a possession game or I don’t know. He got moved down the lineup, wasn’t performing as well, got injured, got benched. He and Mack have obvious chemistry and I think it’s worth keeping them together.
Really what I wanted most of the games to be this year. Young kids scoring in close losses. At least tonight's game was competitive, if a bit dull until the third.Can't get a better result than that. Smith & Celebrini produced. Regulation time loss with no stupid bonus point. They just need to do no better than 2-3 in their last 5 games to make this a successful tank.
He's one of our few players who can pass the puck well from behind the net. Eklund is the other who's done well in that spot.Something about trying to play a possession game or I don’t know. He got moved down the lineup, wasn’t performing as well, got injured, got benched. He and Mack have obvious chemistry and I think it’s worth keeping them together.
As frustrating as things have been to watch for much of this season, it really has been something of a smashing success: Smith reaching 40 points in 69 games (especially after his slow start), Celebrini being on the verge of reaching 60 (57 in 65 games, while playing so often against opponents' top players), and being in pole position for the best odds in the draft and a top 3 pick?God this f***ing team. Smith with 40 points on the year and Mack with 2 points at least
They unloaded a decent amount of talent along the way. Now is the time to cash in what they got back and turn it into help for the team. Next year's October squad needs to be better than this year's October squad. I'm not expecting miracles, but we can't just be exclusively dumpster diving this year.As frustrating as things have been to watch for much of this season, it really has been something of a smashing success: Smith reaching 40 points in 69 games (especially after his slow start), Celebrini being on the verge of reaching 60 (57 in 65 games, while playing so often against opponents' top players), and being in pole position for the best odds in the draft and a top 3 pick?
It's easy to complain night-to-night, but big picture-wise, this is the stuff that really matters.
They unloaded a decent amount of talent along the way. Now is the time to cash in what they got back and turn it into help for the team. Next year's October squad needs to be better than this year's October squad. I'm not expecting miracles, but we can't just be exclusively dumpster diving this year.
I was hoping for 80 points between them and they're going to blow that out of the water even considering that they'll each have missed ~10 games with injuries/"development days" in Smith's case.Rough finish to that game, but I agree with those sayings it’s the ideal outcome. I guessed in the prediction thread, we’d get 100 points from Smith and Celebrini. That looks to be spot on, but they’ve been better than I had hoped for, and are doing it in a few less games- and with less talent.
I have to agree. Losing stinks, of course, but the two big kids, along with ek, have shown that they can be the real deal. Its fair to expect all three to be bona fide top 6F, possibly top 3F for a decade to come. That was the big win...As frustrating as things have been to watch for much of this season, it really has been something of a smashing success: Smith reaching 40 points in 69 games (especially after his slow start), Celebrini being on the verge of reaching 60 (57 in 65 games, while playing so often against opponents' top players), and being in pole position for the best odds in the draft and a top 3 pick?
It's easy to complain night-to-night, but big picture-wise, this is the stuff that really matters.
I agree, keeping walman and zetterlund coulda led to 2 more wins. I hated the walman trade at the time, but Ive come around a bit to it. keeping one more year of him is not worth a 1st and id rather the top lottery shot too. Of course, I wouldn't have minded keeping him for term, either. I think hes a very solid top 4D on a playoff team.I was hoping for 80 points between them and they're going to blow that out of the water even considering that they'll each have missed ~10 games with injuries/"development days" in Smith's case.
I think we also have to consider that as well as this team has played post-4 Nations, we might have played ourselves out of the best lottery odds if we'd kept even just Walman and Zetterlund.