GDT: Game 77: Calgary Flames @ Los Angeles Kings | Thursday, Mar 31 2016 - 7:30PM PT

[kingsfan28]

If the Flames had scored with Gio in the crease at the end of the period, they'd have probably counted it.

 

[TonySCV]

That was the worst goalie interference call I have seen all season. Flames got jobbed.

They have to make that rule less subjective.

 

[The Night King]

What a weak azz no goal call.

You can say ass.

 

[kingsfan28]

That was the worst goalie interference call I have seen all season. Flames got jobbed.

They have to make that rule less subjective.

There have been worse. I saw one where the players jersey brushed the glove of the goalie and they overturned it.

 

[HookKing]

WTF? No mainboard whinefest yet?

 

[Telos]

WTF? No mainboard whinefest yet?

It's coming. Unfortunately this time it is justified.

 

[HookKing]

That was the worst goalie interference call I have seen all season. Flames got jobbed.

They have to make that rule less subjective.

Yeah, absolutely the worst since the call wasn't even interference.

 

[kingsholygrail]

I think there's an argument to be made and so long as the rule remains as subjective as it is, then there will be calls like this. The coach's challenge just amplifies the issue.

 

[TonySCV]

There have been worse. I saw one where the players jersey brushed the glove of the goalie and they overturned it.

There wasn't even fontact here!

If that was goalie interference, we're never going to have goals in the NHL again.

 

[HookKing]

There wasn't even fontact here!

If that was goalie interference, we're never going to have goals in the NHL again.

Incidental contact is not interference. None of you guys get what the ref called.

 

[bob77]

Incidental contact is not interference. None of you guys get what the ref called.

I think it was just the old fashion man in the crease called on the guy at the top of the crease.

 

[HookKing]

I think it was just the old fashion man in the crease called on the guy at the top of the crease.

It could be, the rule is pretty plain.

If an attacking player establishes a significant position within the goal crease, so as to obstruct the goalkeeper's vision and impair his ability to defend his goal, and a goal is scored, the goal will be disallowed.

(NOTE 6)For this purpose, a player "establishes a significant position within the crease" when, in the Referee's judgment, his body, or a substantial portion thereof, is within the goal crease for more than an instantaneous period of time.

 

[kingsholygrail]

I think it was just the old fashion man in the crease called on the guy at the top of the crease.

Colborne makes contact with Quick and never makes an attempt to get out of the crease.

 

[Ziggy Stardust]

I guess both Muzzin and Martinez didn't want to defend against Gaudreau and bailed out.

 

[kingsfan28]

Don't phone this period in!

 

[bob77]

The key word is "inside." Quick never was outside the crease, thus no incidental contact allowed. If Quick were outside the crease, then he could possibly be interfered with.

 

[HookKing]

How long before the 2 goal lead is gone?

 

[Zero Pucks Given]

I paid off the ref before the game and told him to call back any Flames goal. You guys are welcome.

 

[kingsfan28]

Oh Dowd! Rookie mistake will get you benched for the rest of the season and straight into Sutter dog house.

 

[kingsfan28]

Uh, who's on the pp?

 

[HookKing]

Oh Dowd! Rookie mistake will get you benched for the rest of the season and straight into Sutter dog house.

Yep. Shore shall return.

 

[kingsholygrail]

Dowd made a couple really bad passes tonight, though I've liked his effort.

 

[kingsfan28]

I wonder what your BAL would be after eating one of those CJ's Moonshine Burgers?

 

[kingsholygrail]

I wonder what your BAL would be after eating one of those CJ's Moonshine Burgers?

I always love seeing what crazy burgers CJ comes out with.

 

[HookKing]

Kings are clearly rattled.