FLHabs Send all your underacheiving prospects!! Feb 18, 2017 2,085 5,209 Mar 27, 2025 #1,426 Shouldn't take that long, Habs bout to get screwed *
Rapala Registered User Mar 29, 2013 38,030 44,712 Montreal Mar 27, 2025 #1,428 Suzuki wins that face off we have to control that puck now we are f***ed that goal is going to be called good.
Suzuki wins that face off we have to control that puck now we are f***ed that goal is going to be called good.
Skip Bayless The Skip Bayless Show Aug 28, 2014 20,100 30,020 Mar 27, 2025 #1,429 Thats definitely interference Reactions: LarryO and Matthew McConaughay
OnTheRun /dev/null May 17, 2014 12,162 12,323 Mar 27, 2025 #1,430 That shouldn't be a good goal... But then again, it probably depends on the phase of the moon and the height of the tide. Reactions: dgeezus, LarryO, Reimannsum1988 and 1 other person
That shouldn't be a good goal... But then again, it probably depends on the phase of the moon and the height of the tide.
TCIH Registered User Nov 26, 2007 2,566 412 Mar 27, 2025 #1,431 I'm not going to say whether it should count or not, I just know the challenge is going to fail.
Gravity Generational Poster Feb 27, 2017 11,702 22,499 In a Barred Spiral Mar 27, 2025 #1,432 HabsWhiteKnightLOL said: Brink didn't do shit . This goal is good Click to expand... Yes he did.
Riddick412 Crash da net! Dec 15, 2011 6,255 7,270 Ottawa Mar 27, 2025 #1,433 It should have been disallowed on the ice. Open your eyes ref.
Grand Admiral Thrawn Registered User May 24, 2012 3,460 4,262 Montreal Mar 27, 2025 #1,434 Goal will be allowed. Only Gallagher's wind is cause for goalie interference. The Flyer player touched the goalie fully and was also behind him in the crease... we have a good goal!
Goal will be allowed. Only Gallagher's wind is cause for goalie interference. The Flyer player touched the goalie fully and was also behind him in the crease... we have a good goal!
Tuggy HFBoards Sponsor Sponsor Nov 26, 2003 48,926 19,187 Saint John Mar 27, 2025 #1,435 Lol I guarantee that's called back against Gallagher Reactions: Habs10Habs, HabsForHire and LesCactus
Lafleurs Guy Guuuuuuuy! Jul 20, 2007 74,202 57,180 Mar 27, 2025 #1,436 It SHOULD be interference. Goalie can’t get over because the guy’s preventing him from doing so
Beaker In My Lab Goggles Jun 4, 2007 5,386 2,208 In The Lab. Mar 27, 2025 #1,437 We’re not a playoff team…
The Great Weal Phil's Pizza Jan 15, 2015 52,463 76,923 Mar 27, 2025 #1,438 Lmao classic. Yet that Newhook one against the Panthers counts when Bob had no chance.
Andrei79 Registered User Jan 25, 2013 15,144 34,991 Mar 27, 2025 #1,439 Yeah, team is not American enough to have that overturned. Lol.
Geecko Registered User Aug 21, 2012 1,319 2,450 Mar 27, 2025 #1,440 If that was Gallagher though. Reactions: Habs10Habs
HabsForHire "Expect the unexpected" Sep 21, 2011 3,472 3,892 CT Mar 27, 2025 #1,443 Definitely should be a no goal, if that's gallagher you know what the outcome would be
Lafleurs Guy Guuuuuuuy! Jul 20, 2007 74,202 57,180 Mar 27, 2025 #1,444 Bah. I don’t agree with that Reactions: Gravity
Gravity Generational Poster Feb 27, 2017 11,702 22,499 In a Barred Spiral Mar 27, 2025 #1,446 Horseshit call Reactions: LesCactus
David Suzuki Registered User Aug 25, 2010 17,661 9,981 New Brunswick Mar 27, 2025 #1,447 gallagher must lose his mind on these man Reactions: HabsForHire and Reimannsum1988
schwang26 Registered User Mar 15, 2022 3,606 5,557 Mar 27, 2025 #1,448 He prevented him from moving across. I don’t know what u guys are looking at
HabsWhiteKnightLOL Registered User Apr 29, 2017 34,730 53,939 Somewhere on earth in a hospital Mar 27, 2025 #1,449 Dumb challenge he never pushed Dobes