GDT: GAME #65 3/4 7 PM ET - New Jersey at BRUINS | NESN, 98.5 WBZ-FM
- Thread starter Fenway
- Start date
- Status
TwineTickler
TheUltimateBruin
Don't agree with the decision to start Khudobin.... we need this game. It's not a back to back situation... you gotta ride your #1 in my opinion. We better win this ****ing game.
BruinsFanMike82
Registered User
Khudobin may have made a few good saves last time but he also gave up even more horrible rebounds.
TMac21
Save us Sweeney
- May 21, 2003
- 10,867
- 1
Can't play Rask every game, Cassidy has to show faith Dobby can get it done.
Rask wasn't exactly great against NYR either.
Jorah Marshmont
Long may he reign
- May 10, 2012
- 4,699
- 3,127
I'm ecstatic that 1. I can watch this game since it's at night and I work Saturdays. and 2. that I don't have to watch Beleskey and Hayes lumbering around behind the play all night. This should be the line up for the rest of the season.
ReggieMoto
Registered User
I agree with this. Every game has become a must-win. While true you can't play Rask in every game between now and end of regular season, he needs to play the vast majority of them.
Jean_Jacket41
Neely = HOF
Jean_Jacket41
Neely = HOF
He better not have a stinker. Don't know why they are not playing Rask for this one.
talkinaway
Registered User
I'm on the Khudobin fence....but I sort of think you have to grit your teeth and go with Rask unless you've got a back-to-back, OR you're in a safer playoff position.
That said, we're right in the middle of a 7-in-14 stretch, with only one extra day off next Thurs/Fri. If you're going to play Khudobin, you sort of have to do it against New Jersey - centrally located in the schedule, not a tough team (ie NYR two days ago), and not a divisional foe (OTT in two days).
I don't think Khudobin's been as bad as he's made out to be. His first game was Toronto's home opener - that was bound to be wacky. Then a game against MTL that a backup honestly has no business playing. Followed by Black Friday against CGY - first game back since his arm injury. Losing against Colorado, admittedly, is not excusable - especially with 4 goals against. But if you call under 2.1 GAA a winnable game, he's had 4 in 10 winnable games, and two more games that are around 3 GAA. That's not stellar, but it's at least average: 4 wins, 2 okays, and 4 bads.
Plus, we may be calling on Rask to do an OTT/TOR back-to-back. Rather have him rested to pick up those two 4-point games against teams that are both beatable AND important to beat.
Still, even with all this devil's advocate, I'd rather see Rask. Doesn't mean we automatically lose - just makes it a little tougher.
That said, we're right in the middle of a 7-in-14 stretch, with only one extra day off next Thurs/Fri. If you're going to play Khudobin, you sort of have to do it against New Jersey - centrally located in the schedule, not a tough team (ie NYR two days ago), and not a divisional foe (OTT in two days).
I don't think Khudobin's been as bad as he's made out to be. His first game was Toronto's home opener - that was bound to be wacky. Then a game against MTL that a backup honestly has no business playing. Followed by Black Friday against CGY - first game back since his arm injury. Losing against Colorado, admittedly, is not excusable - especially with 4 goals against. But if you call under 2.1 GAA a winnable game, he's had 4 in 10 winnable games, and two more games that are around 3 GAA. That's not stellar, but it's at least average: 4 wins, 2 okays, and 4 bads.
Plus, we may be calling on Rask to do an OTT/TOR back-to-back. Rather have him rested to pick up those two 4-point games against teams that are both beatable AND important to beat.
Still, even with all this devil's advocate, I'd rather see Rask. Doesn't mean we automatically lose - just makes it a little tougher.
22Brad Park
Registered User
You win and lose as a team so no issue starting Dobby He has been good under Cassidy..Watched Schneider for Devils the other nite vs habs .He stunk.No excuses not potting 3 or 4 today vs this bad team.
Last edited:
Rask needs games off he will probably only have 3 more games off the rest of the year at most
If Tuukka plays 15 out of the last 18 games
He will have played 67 games that's a lot of hockey
Trap Jesus
Registered User
- Feb 13, 2012
- 28,686
- 13,458
I feel like it'll be tough to expect Vatrano-Spooner-Stafford to stick, just for defense. Hayes was also relied on a little bit to take draws on that line in place of Spooner (even if he was absolutely horrid at them). I think we could see a Backes/Stafford swap at some point.
Tuukka SV% by month
October .958%
November .932%
December .915%
January .882%
February .895%
Tuukka has been horrible in 2017 the brutal schedule at the start of the season playing 5/6 more games than every other team in the NHL has really taken its toll on him
Since Jan 1
Tuukka has had a SV% above .915 in just 8 of his 23 starts
Start of the season to Jan 1st
Tuukka had a SV% above .915 in 16 of 28 starts
October .958%
November .932%
December .915%
January .882%
February .895%
Tuukka has been horrible in 2017 the brutal schedule at the start of the season playing 5/6 more games than every other team in the NHL has really taken its toll on him
Since Jan 1
Tuukka has had a SV% above .915 in just 8 of his 23 starts
Start of the season to Jan 1st
Tuukka had a SV% above .915 in 16 of 28 starts
Not to mention the back up situation and who knows if he is playing injured, etc?
I wouldn't say horrible, save% can be just as much fault on his also horrible defensive play by his defenseman.
22Brad Park
Registered User
That's the way I see it too.Stafford with Bergeron line and Backes down with Spooner
Ever since that groin scare where he missed a couple games he has never seemed the same
Would not shock me if he is still playing hurt
That sucks if its the case because he pretty much has no other choice other then tell the team he's out and then everyone's season is basically over.
Mpasta
Registered User
- Oct 6, 2008
- 5,804
- 722
Bruins don't play another team with this bad of an offense for the rest of the season.
If Khudobin can't play well enough against the Devils then Rask will get burnt out and we won't make the playoffs anyways.
Trap Jesus
Registered User
- Feb 13, 2012
- 28,686
- 13,458
Yeah, I can't hate on the decision to start Khudobin. I get that every point matters, but when Rask has clearly been overworked this season, you really need to pick your spots down the stretch. 29th best offense is definitely a good spot to do that.
Mpasta
Registered User
- Oct 6, 2008
- 5,804
- 722
Career wise, Stafford is a hell of a lot better at taking faceoffs than Hayes. So there's an improvement right there.
But it would be interesting to see Backes and Stafford swapped if things don't work out with him on the 3rd.
Let's hope Dobby controls his rebounds and plays solid.
I have no issues with Stafford playing with Spoons and Vatrano. It's an upgrade over Hayes. Think they'll play fine. Gotta have faith and believe.
I have no issues with Stafford playing with Spoons and Vatrano. It's an upgrade over Hayes. Think they'll play fine. Gotta have faith and believe.
- Status
