That might have been the worst game of Seth Jones' career.
predictable. Go Sabres.
And ****.
That was a winnable game.
Except Jones weirdly. He had a slow start anyways.
And a bad finish ironically.
Anyone really think Jones is worth an long term big money deal yet? He's a 2 year bridge deal if the FO is thinking soundly. Same $ as Murray sounds about right.
This team is going to have trouble scoring goals against good teams. The Bruins first line was far superior to the CBJ #1 line. #17 was invisible last night-except when he held Chara right in front of the ref and then whined when he was caught red-handed.
A good showing of Bs fans. 300 or so? More than a few Bobby Orr unis. The greatest defensemen to ever play the game.
Anyone really think Jones is worth an long term big money deal yet? He's a 2 year bridge deal if the FO is thinking soundly. Same $ as Murray sounds about right.
This team is going to have trouble scoring goals against good teams. The Bruins first line was far superior to the CBJ #1 line. #17 was invisible last night-except when he held Chara right in front of the ref and then whined when he was caught red-handed.
A good showing of Bs fans. 300 or so? More than a few Bobby Orr unis. The greatest defensemen to ever play the game.
Anyone really think Jones is worth an long term big money deal yet? He's a 2 year bridge deal if the FO is thinking soundly. Same $ as Murray sounds about right.
This team is going to have trouble scoring goals against good teams. The Bruins first line was far superior to the CBJ #1 line. #17 was invisible last night-except when he held Chara right in front of the ref and then whined when he was caught red-handed.
A good showing of Bs fans. 300 or so? More than a few Bobby Orr unis. The greatest defensemen to ever play the game.
Anyone really think Jones is worth an long term big money deal yet? He's a 2 year bridge deal if the FO is thinking soundly. Same $ as Murray sounds about right.
This was my immediate thought about Jones. He's going to be good, but he's young and doesn't deserve a long term contract at this point. A 2-3 year bridge deal that leaves the Jackets holding his rights at the completion is the way to go. The only young player that has earned a long term contract is Jenner and he probably deserves the "C" too.
I remember something one of European friends wrote awhile back:
"In Europe we pay for what a guy is going to do; in America you pay for what he has done."
Jones is going to be good for a long time. He is going to get better. If we can lock him up for 6 years now at up to 6 mill it is better than waiting two years and locking him up for 7+.
I totally get that.
My only fear is how many guys (after coming here) quit or got frustrated pretty quickly.
Now I love Jones's pedigree (father was in NBA as player and now coaching) so he gets what it takes to be a pro. And I would be happy to lock him up long term but that fear is always there in my head if you pay him, will he keep progressing (or will he regress like others have in CBJ land)?
One of the pros of signing Jones longer term at a bit of a discount is that it probably enhances possible trade value. While I'm not as enamored with him as most are on this board, it's obvious that has some significant talent. I doubt that he would become very hard to trade over the next half decade. It's one of the reasons that the front office's insistence on a bridge with Johansen made so little sense to me. As with Jones, Johansen wasn't going to lose much trade value over the first few years of a longer term deal. Having a young asset signed at a bit of a discount would seem to enhance the market value of that player.
Still, with cap issues staring this team in the fact, it's probably a best overall strategy to 2 year bridge him, shed some salaries and get two more years to really decide whether this kid is all most think he's cracked up to be.
I expect a bridge deal, but with term siginificantly higher than Murray. Murray would be higher too if he hadn't had the injury history. I'd guess 2 years $8 mil.