branch
#GirlBoss #Vibes
- Jan 12, 2008
- 8,958
- 7,367
They should have kept Merilainen up. They played way differently in front of him.
Forsberg wasn't anything special, but I felt like he gave them a chance to stay in the game but our injury depleted forward core just can't generate enough offense.They should have kept Merilainen up. They played way differently in front of him.
I agree, give Halliday or Jenik a chance, Ostapchuk isn't a liability, but he's just mehListen, I know I've said this before, and I agree he’s not the reason they’re losing. I’m also a big fan of his and believe he has a bright future here. But they really should consider sending Ostapchuk down.
I just don’t see how being on pace for 2 goals this season benefits him or the team in the long run. Let him play real minutes and develop his offensive game so that when he’s ready for a full-time role, he can contribute 20-30 points and be the Adam Lowry type, instead of the eight he’s currently projected for.
I get that depth is an issue, but surely you can find a #4C who can provide more offense for a mid-round draft pick.
This team desperately needs scoring, and it would be nice if the fourth line could chip in once in a while.
Send him down and trade a 4th for Nick Bjugstad or something.
Here's my possible explanation: they wanted to play Ullmark in his last game before the break so they can see whether he's fully healthy and can go to the 4 Nations, or whether he should rest during the break. Then they worked it backwards and decided to play Forsberg last night instead.So still couldn't find an answer as to why Forsberg was in instead of Ulmark
I understood Green said it was because Ullmark was just coming back and had a lot of work in game 1. I did not see the quote yetSo still couldn't find an answer as to why Forsberg was in instead of Ulmark
Green explained his decision to play his backup in an enormous game as easing Ullmark back from injury. “I think that’s a big part of it,” he said, “We want to get him two of these games.”
“Good chance he’ll play the next one.”
IN the 1st one Paul went out pretty early and they missed Cirelli for a good stretch so they were down 2 Cs for that period and Cirelli did come back but.. he was out the next game so that tells us he was playing hurt.Yes we have injuries but they were missing a team Canada forward too. Didn't love the lines, wish we could generate more.
So pick one when we are healthyI liked Reinhardt again.
Who gets waived to create the cap space? Matinpalo? We are currently short forwards. We needed to put 2 players on LTIR to create space for Ullmark... Its a bit of a mess with just over 100k in cap space.They should have kept Merilainen up. They played way differently in front of him.
Guessing it was Ulmark's game to lose Tuesday night!So still couldn't find an answer as to why Forsberg was in instead of Ulmark