GDT: GAME 53 | Sens @ Preds | Prime Time in Music City! Edition | Mon Feb 3 2025, 7:30PM | Prime Video, TVAS

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
My interpretation of the challenge after the review (I could be wrong...)

The refs originally called no goal due to goalie interference. Then they were reviewing to see if the puck went in the net before the whistle (or how exactly it went in). They came to the conclusion the puck went into the net legally, and before the whistle, so the call on the ice was no goal due to goalie interference (because can they review goalie interference without a challenge? I imagine not?).

So Green challenges goalie interference, which they uphold, and it's no goal. Worthwhile challenge, IMO, because that was probably not goaltender interference.I

My interpretation of the challenge after the review (I could be wrong...)

The refs originally called no goal due to goalie interference. Then they were reviewing to see if the puck went in the net before the whistle (or how exactly it went in). They came to the conclusion the puck went into the net legally, and before the whistle, so the call on the ice was no goal due to goalie interference (because can they review goalie interference without a challenge? I imagine not?).

So Green challenges goalie interference, which they uphold, and it's no goal. Worthwhile challenge, IMO, because that was probably not goaltender interference.
That’s probably what happened. Seeing as the ref standing right there blew the whistle not even knowing the puck was in they should have refrained from any initial ruling on goalie interference. Go review to see if the puck was in before the whistle… yes it was so call it good goal. Then Nashville has to use a challenge to have them review for goalie interference should they choose. iMO that is how it should have unfolded.
 
Guess people are enjoying Severance's second season as much as the first one?

I always feel like these high-concept mystery shows fall flat after the first season but I might have to get going on this one.
Feel like most shows nowadays throw everything they have at the first season, to try and get renewed and stay on the air, but don't really have an endgame or idea of what to do afterwards. Severance feels calculated, like every little detail means something, and everything is a clue towards the endgame.
 
  • Like
Reactions: L'Aveuglette
TALK is actually quite talented, not really my style of music but I suspect a lot of the people who are put off by his look would actually like it a lot.

Never hurts to see someone from the city having some success, repping the team.
he just showed up full Alfie jersey with the C - said his favourite player was Patrick Lalime - and threw some shade at Redden

bro he's a 10/10 here now
 
TALK is actually quite talented, not really my style of music but I suspect a lot of the people who are put off by his look would actually like it a lot.

Never hurts to see someone from the city having some success, repping the team.
So the guy interviewed during Intermission is called "Talk"? Never heard of him before. Any good?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad