KingsFan7824
Registered User
- Dec 4, 2003
- 19,541
- 7,615
Yes and no.
The Stoll contract was just bad, it was bad when he signed it, it's bad today and it will be bad next season.
There are certainly plenty of other guys who have given the Kings worse value this season than those two (Brown, Greene, Richards, Mitchell), but those guys have built up equity of past success with the team. Giving up almost 10% of your cap space to Stoll and Regehr was not good asset management by the Kings.
So who would the better options have been at the time of those signings? Just any semi-warm body?