GDT: Game #5 of the season Ducks visit Bruins 7:00 PM ET Oct. 20, 2022

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ducks in a row

Go Ducks Quack Quack
Dec 17, 2013
18,076
4,475
U.S.A.
Ducks in pool.gif

1 - 3 - 0 for 2 points with a Road Record of 0 - 3 - 0

Production Leaders
Goals: Terry with 3
Assists: Terry and McTavish with 3
Points: Terry with 6

vs.

Bruins.gif

3 - 1 - 0 for 6 points with a Home Record of 2 - 0 - 0

Production Leaders
Goals: Pastrnak, Bergeron and Greer with 3
Assists: Pastrnak with 5
Points: Pastrnak with 8

Let's Go Ducks.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ducks DVM

AngryMilkcrates

End of an Era
Jun 4, 2016
17,734
28,707
Missing 3 of our top 4 defensemen. The rest have not played much together and are in a much different system under new coach Monty. If you are aggressive you will get some chances. Could be a fun one.
Boston is getting goals from all 4 lines right now and averaging 5 a game so far.
Hope you guys like some pond hockey!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Leonardo87

Leonardo87

New York Rangers, Anaheim Ducks, and TMNT fan.
Sponsor
Dec 8, 2013
41,402
65,983
New York
Missing our top 3 defensemen. The rest have not played much together and are in a much different system under new coach Monty. If you are aggressive you will get some chances. Could be a fun one.
Boston is getting goals from all 4 lines right now and averaging 5 a game so far.
Hope you guys like some pond hockey!

Ducks fans taking back Lindholm tonight , beware…..

FA247EC1-1EB0-4861-B68D-2AB58BDDEEDD.gif
 

Kalv

Slava Ukraini
Mar 29, 2009
24,261
12,339
Latvia
This is fantastic.

Mind if I use this in our GDT?
Absolutely, it's not my image anyway :laugh:


Oh, about the game, I will only add that I will be happy if we can break the ''outshot by 20-to-40'' cycle. Albeit not overly optimistic :laugh: We're the worst in the league at this. We're making (tied) least shots in the league, and are allowing the most shots in the league. What a freaking exciting combo :laugh: :cry:
 

KelVarnsen

Registered User
May 2, 2010
10,977
5,343
Mission Viejo
Missing 3 of our top 4 defensemen. The rest have not played much together and are in a much different system under new coach Monty. If you are aggressive you will get some chances. Could be a fun one.
Boston is getting goals from all 4 lines right now and averaging 5 a game so far.
Hope you guys like some pond hockey!
It doesnt matter. Your backup defensemen are better than the Ducks regulars.

Ducks are almost guaranteed to give up at least 5 goals.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: AngryMilkcrates

Arthuros

Registered Snoozer
Feb 24, 2014
13,597
9,256
Littleroot Town
I haven't been around long enough to have a good frame of reference, but I cannot think of many goalies like Gibson who pass the eye test for being a top goalie but are so heavily bombarded night-in night-out that they look terrible in terms of actual stats.

Most recent reference I have might be Lehtonen, who was far more blunder-prone but also didn't have the best defensive support around him and arguably was better than he looked on the stat sheet for quite some time.
 
Aug 11, 2011
29,202
24,743
Am Yisrael Chai
I haven't been around long enough to have a good frame of reference, but I cannot think of many goalies like Gibson who pass the eye test for being a top goalie but are so heavily bombarded night-in night-out that they look terrible in terms of actual stats. Most recent reference I have might be Lehtonen, who was far more blunder-prone but also didn't have the best defensive support around him and arguably was better than he looked on the stat sheet for quite some time.
I was going to say Hebert, but he actually looked quite good on the stats (he was top-5 in shots faced for like the first 6 years of the franchise and top-10 in save percentage), just underrated. So that's basically the opposite of what you're talking about.
 

bsu

"I have no idea what I am doing" -Pat VerBleak
Sep 27, 2017
28,539
29,293
"He is not intense. That word is not in his vocabulary. It's never going to be in his vocabulary. He can't spell intense." -Brian Burke


"We are not intense. That word is not in our vocabulary. It's never going to be in our vocabulary. We can't spell intense." -Dallas Eakins
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad

Ad