GDT: [Game #48] Dallas Stars vs. Anaheim Ducks – 7:00 PM CT (BSSW)

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
No wonder Bally is going bankrupt

“Hole in one!!!!!”

IMG_3054.jpeg


Get rekt EP40
 
Where is the 3rd point he's talking about for Harley, didn't he only have an assist tonight, so the goal makes 2?
I'm pretty sure Craig Smith's goal was originally announced with Harley and Dadonov getting the assists. I have no idea why they're now saying that it was unassisted. The Ducks never possessed the puck prior to Smith scoring.
 
  • Like
Reactions: account deactivated
I'm pretty sure Craig Smith's goal was originally announced with Harley and Dadonov getting the assists. I have no idea why they're now saying that it was unassisted. The Ducks never possessed the puck prior to Smith scoring.

Funny they remove those assists, but Hintz literally taking the puck off the stick of a Red Wings player last game who clearly had possession was apparently okay to give assists on
 
Funny they remove those assists, but Hintz literally taking the puck off the stick of a Red Wings player last game who clearly had possession was apparently okay to give assists on

Yeah, it's like, they're counting the puck being in his glove as possession, but it's not like he caught it and then pulled it back over the line, it was one motion, so it makes no sense to me.
 
Yeah, it's like, they're counting the puck being in his glove as possession, but it's not like he caught it and then pulled it back over the line, it was one motion, so it makes no sense to me.

On the prior shot I believe the puck was rolling toward the goal line and a duck defender had a soft clear which went to Craig Smith.

So the scorers must be counting that goal line clear as posession
 
Where is the 3rd point he's talking about for Harley, didn't he only have an assist tonight, so the goal makes 2?

Harley was involved in the Smith goal. It's just counted as unassisted now. Not sure where a Ducks player had possesion on that goal though . Those failed clear attempts don't look like a Ducks player ever had control of the puck
 
On the prior shot I believe the puck was rolling toward the goal line and a duck defender had a soft clear which went to Craig Smith.

So the scorers must be counting that goal line clear as posession
Like @Kcb12345 posted earlier. The Hintz goal against the Red Wings was more obvious than this goal lol.
 

Ad

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad