monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"
GDT: - Game 45: Sharks vs. Wild 7:00pm NBCSCA | Page 7 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League
  • Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates, this is just a temporary look. We will continue to work on clearing up these issues for the next few days and restore the site to it's more familiar look, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into. Thanks for your patience and understanding.

GDT: Game 45: Sharks vs. Wild 7:00pm NBCSCA

9gfk8d.jpg
 
I have few criticisms of Warsofsky but I still can not wrap my head around starting the 4th line seemingly every game. It's surrending the first few minutes of every game and maybe I'm missing something in that strategy but it's seems unusual. And secondly, Goodrow needs to be scratched. The accountability and ego management aspect of coaching I understand, but you can not punish rookie teenagers and not the veteran who seemingly plays worse than said teenagers.

The biggest letdown last night was seemingly getting goalie'd by the Wilds B squad. Unfortunate.
 
I have few criticisms of Warsofsky but I still can not wrap my head around starting the 4th line seemingly every game. It's surrending the first few minutes of every game and maybe I'm missing something in that strategy but it's seems unusual. And secondly, Goodrow needs to be scratched. The accountability and ego management aspect of coaching I understand, but you can not punish rookie teenagers and not the veteran who seemingly plays worse than said teenagers.

The biggest letdown last night was seemingly getting goalie'd by the Wilds B squad. Unfortunate.
Yeah I don't get that starting line decision. Irritating.
 
I have few criticisms of Warsofsky but I still can not wrap my head around starting the 4th line seemingly every game. It's surrending the first few minutes of every game and maybe I'm missing something in that strategy but it's seems unusual. And secondly, Goodrow needs to be scratched. The accountability and ego management aspect of coaching I understand, but you can not punish rookie teenagers and not the veteran who seemingly plays worse than said teenagers.

The biggest letdown last night was seemingly getting goalie'd by the Wilds B squad. Unfortunate.
If anything, we've been starting games consistently well. It's an energy thing and a possession thing. I don't mind it. Don't think it matters much, but I'd say that starting well is something this team has done, especially at home, the majority of games this year.
 
What's with the suicidal thoughts? We played a pretty solid game. Massively outshot them, two bad turnovers lead to two goals against. Celebrini looked like his old self with Eklund. Keep them together.

I was watching without sound so I'm not sure if Smith got benched or injured, but hope he's ok.

View attachment 959967
Ya tbh other than Mack not getting rewarded with a goal, and Smith forcing a beer league pass through 4 Wild, these are the kind of losses I WANT. Our key guys (-Smith, although he did have some good shifts) played well tonight against a very good Wild team.

And we increase our odds of 1OA?

Easy win for me this season.

But I’d like for Mack to get a few multi-point games and a couple Ws soon for their sake.
 
Ya tbh other than Mack not getting rewarded with a goal, and Smith forcing a beer league pass through 4 Wild, these are the kind of losses I WANT. Our key guys (-Smith, although he did have some good shifts) played well tonight against a very good Wild team.

And we increase our odds of 1OA?

Easy win for me this season.

But I’d like for Mack to get a few multi-point games and a couple Ws soon for their sake.
I agree with the outlook. They did a lot of things better, still look like will make some changes, and lost anyway. I’d like to see Zetterlund with Eklund and Celebrini. I’d like to see Granlund with Smith if he’s going to be in the lineup. Whatever the rest looks like is whatever to me.
 
I have few criticisms of Warsofsky but I still can not wrap my head around starting the 4th line seemingly every game. It's surrending the first few minutes of every game and maybe I'm missing something in that strategy but it's seems unusual. And secondly, Goodrow needs to be scratched. The accountability and ego management aspect of coaching I understand, but you can not punish rookie teenagers and not the veteran who seemingly plays worse than said teenagers.

The biggest letdown last night was seemingly getting goalie'd by the Wilds B squad. Unfortunate.
Warsosky is our:
61g9FBfsXdL._SL1000_.jpg
 
Coaching is a much bigger problem. A big part of success is finding contributions from young or limited players, and Warso is atrocious at it.

I would've liked Kaliyev as a shooting threat on the 3rd line.
Not in this case. The Sharks have rarely been blown out this season and in fact they have the most 1 goal or one goal with empty netter games this year in the NHL with 21.

The Sharks have 3/6ths of a top 6 and have zero top line defensemen. Walman is a 2nd pair dman and the rest of D are bottom pair or 4th pair.
 
Not in this case. The Sharks have rarely been blown out this season and in fact they have the most 1 goal or one goal with empty netter games this year in the NHL with 21.

The Sharks have 3/6ths of a top 6 and have zero top line defensemen. Walman is a 2nd pair dman and the rest of D are bottom pair or 4th pair.
Yes, that's the problem with Warso's coaching strategy of stacking the top line and having the rest of the team play hard defense. It sacrifices wins and development to not lose as badly sometimes.

The Sharks have 5-7 capable top 6 forwards depending on how you count Smith and Wennberg and 4+ decent defensemen. There's no reason the offense should be anemic instead of just inconsistent just because he doesn't have a superstar or elite depth because most contenders don't even have every player in their top 6 as a standalone stud.
 
Yes, that's the problem with Warso's coaching strategy of stacking the top line and having the rest of the team play hard defense. It sacrifices wins and development to not lose as badly sometimes.

The Sharks have 5-7 capable top 6 forwards depending on how you count Smith and Wennberg and 4+ decent defensemen. There's no reason the offense should be anemic instead of just inconsistent just because he doesn't have a superstar or elite depth because most contenders don't even have every player in their top 6 as a standalone stud.
In what world do they have 5-7 top-6 forwards? With how they're playing, I would say Eklund and Celebrini fit that description. Granlund and Toffoli are established top-6 guys. That's pretty much it...Wennberg and Zetterlund are quality 3rd line forwards, but they're top-6 guys only on bad teams. Smith may get there in the future, but he's not there right now, which is fine.

Regarding defensemen, it depends on what you consider "decent." If that includes bottom pair guys, I agree. Walman-Ceci is a quality 2nd pair. Liljegren is a solid bottom pair RD. Ferraro could pass as a #6D, and Thrun may get there too. While Walman could pass as a #3, zero top-pair D.

Warso does certainly make some interesting lineup decisions, but he's working with a terrible roster that is set up to pick top-5 (top-3 if we're being honest) to continue the rebuild.
 
Yes, that's the problem with Warso's coaching strategy of stacking the top line and having the rest of the team play hard defense. It sacrifices wins and development to not lose as badly sometimes.

The Sharks have 5-7 capable top 6 forwards depending on how you count Smith and Wennberg and 4+ decent defensemen. There's no reason the offense should be anemic instead of just inconsistent just because he doesn't have a superstar or elite depth because most contenders don't even have every player in their top 6 as a standalone stud.

Celebrini, Eklund, Granlund, Zetterlund and Toffoli are the only top-6 worthy forwards. You can't say Warsofsky is stacking offense here. Celebrini has recently had Smith and Kunin as linemates. I believe that clearly indicates the opposite of what you're implying, he's tried to spread the offense.

I would love to know what 4+ decent defensemen we have.
 
Celebrini, Eklund, Granlund, Zetterlund and Toffoli are the only top-6 worthy forwards. You can't say Warsofsky is stacking offense here. Celebrini has recently had Smith and Kunin as linemates. I believe that clearly indicates the opposite of what you're implying, he's tried to spread the offense.

I would love to know what 4+ decent defensemen we have.
I wouldn't even consider Zetterlund a top-6 forward on an actual contending team. He's an excellent 3rd liner who can PK and contribute on PP2
 
I wouldn't even consider Zetterlund a top-6 forward on an actual contending team. He's an excellent 3rd liner who can PK and contribute on PP2
I think if you think of Zetterlund as the dirty work guy on a line, he can work as a 2nd line guy that can also score goals. Personally, I think there's not as much space between him and Eklund as most of the folks on this forum think. Eklund is a better skater and passer, but he's also kinda soft and not really much of a goal scorer. The play he made with Celebrini last night (which was very nice) is something that would need to happen a lot more before I put him in a separate category from the other top 6 candidates on the team.
 
In what world do they have 5-7 top-6 forwards? With how they're playing, I would say Eklund and Celebrini fit that description. Granlund and Toffoli are established top-6 guys. That's pretty much it...Wennberg and Zetterlund are quality 3rd line forwards, but they're top-6 guys only on bad teams. Smith may get there in the future, but he's not there right now, which is fine.

Regarding defensemen, it depends on what you consider "decent." If that includes bottom pair guys, I agree. Walman-Ceci is a quality 2nd pair. Liljegren is a solid bottom pair RD. Ferraro could pass as a #6D, and Thrun may get there too. While Walman could pass as a #3, zero top-pair D.

Warso does certainly make some interesting lineup decisions, but he's working with a terrible roster that is set up to pick top-5 (top-3 if we're being honest) to continue the rebuild.
Zetterlund absolutely makes the top 6 on most teams as a F1. Wennberg played 2nd line minutes for most of his career despite not being a perfect 2nd line center. Most teams would be playing Smith in their top 6 or an offensive 3rd line. Liljegren and Ferraro are both fine number 4-5 defensemen.

There's no reason this team shouldn't be fun and show flashes of potential. Warso for some reason refuses to put traditional lines out either in terms of Playmaker-Sniper-Grinder or even more open guidelines of guys who it would make sense to play as F1-F2-F3 and it hasn't worked out well.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top
-->->