bigbluebird
Dead Eyes McGee
I'm with a lot of you guys. I was super young in 94 and my family barely watched hockey at all. So I didn't appreciate it like I should have. This would mean SOOOO much for me, too, as an adult to witness it.
Post-Game Talk: Game 4: The MSL OT Hour
- Thread starter JESSEWENEEDTOCOOK
- Start date
-
Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
- Status
The Gloaming
23
Amazing Kreiderman
Registered User
- Apr 11, 2011
- 45,070
- 40,920
HoosierDaddy
Registered User
I think I have to call a doctor now, I just busted a gut laughing.
Also props to my brethren in Europe for a sleepless night. I had 1.5 hrs sleep before going to work. Crashed and burned 18:30 until this morning. Damn worth it!
The difference between Fleury and Quick is huge. The difference between defensemen is huge. The difference in depth is huge.
Not saying Rangers can't win. Saying LA is quick, big, and talented. If you don't agree, you have not been watching them.
Both teams are peaking, now.
Last edited:
No, I was saying I thought the Kings would beat Chicago. Others disagreed with me.
eco's bones
Registered User
The Rangers will have their work cut out for them. Winning one of the first two in Los Angeles would be almost a must. The way that team is rolling right now--that is a big, big order. Everybody will have to be at their best--that includes Rick Nash.
Ah I see. It was PGT for game 3. You said you wanted to see Kings-Rangers and I responded by saying that would be the worst possible match up for us. Someone else responded saying that I was wrong about that. My mistake and apologies.
- Status
