Columbus Jack
He's from Columbus
Exactly why we shouldnt trade Milano and Murray for the shiny new toy Matt Duchenemarkus or harrington will be happy to get some ice time in nhl no issue
Exactly why we shouldnt trade Milano and Murray for the shiny new toy Matt Duchenemarkus or harrington will be happy to get some ice time in nhl no issue
arent they both 72?No surprise 72 and 9 were stars of the game, but Calvert was an unsung hero. He played absolutely great - as good a game as you'll get without (officially) scoring......A beast on the PK, too, maybe getting as good a scoring chances as we had on the PP.
Milano and Murray are still pretty new toys.. they can still play with themExactly why we shouldnt trade Milano and Murray for the shiny new toy Matt Duchene
I’ve been to hundreds of CBJ games and that final minute cbj chant was easily one of the loudest I’ve heard. Incredible atmosphere.
Watched my first game of this season, I get that we didn't control some points of the game & I was flipping back and forth with the Yankee / Astros game, but what I saw of the game the Jackets looked very good. Jonesy turnover, Sedlak penalty with both making critical amends for their mistakes. Panarin is deadly - been watching Tarasenko a little bit, some similarities beyond being countrymen.Ohio is more of a hockey state than what people think.
LVP: The Cannon; late on two of the three goals.
Man, I could watch that Zherd... er, Panarin goal all night.
If we had traded Murray, one injury and our D looks likemarkus or harrington will be happy to get some ice time in nhl no issue
Exactly why we shouldnt trade Milano and Murray for the shiny new toy Matt Duchene
I'll take the depth on D everyday of the week and twice on Sunday.
The fact that we're going to be the same division as Kevin Shattenkirk for the next few years is awesome. He blows, as was extremely evident last night.
The guy seated in front of me was all over Shattenkirk. He had lots of material.
Did anyone else notice the D pairing that was put out at the end of the game?
Shutdown pair of Murray and Jones.
Was the Jones-Murray combo to create a shut down pairing or a pairing resulting from the rotational shifts because of having only five Dmen?If we had traded Murray, one injury and our D looks like
Werenski Jones
Johnson Savard
Nutti Harrington
I'mn okay with one of them, not not both.
Did anyone else notice the D pairing that was put out at the end of the game?
Shutdown pair of Murray and Jones.
The entire game my buddy was complaining about Murray (he's played hockey as long as I have 20+ years) and at the end of the game I pointed out he was out there to finish the game because he's so strong defensively and that he played the same role in the world cup with the NAs best talent and then he kinda shut up.
I'll take the depth on D everyday of the week and twice on Sunday.
I think Nuti and Harrington would absolutely be fine for our third pair, especially if that means we land a number 1 center . Plus , u can acquire a depth defenseman , a heck of a lot easier than u can a number 1 center . Jarmo knows that this team most likely is a number 1 center away from being a legit threat in the playoffs . Ideally I would prefer Murray and Bjorkstrand to Colorado, rather than Milano though, and I don’t see anyway they move Carlsson instead of Murray , because of future cap hits . The money in future won’t be there to resign Murray , keep Savard , resign Werenski, and pay Jones .Exactly why we shouldnt trade Milano and Murray for the shiny new toy Matt Duchene
I think Nuti and Harrington would absolutely be fine for our third pair, especially if that means we land a number 1 center . Plus , u can acquire a depth defenseman , a heck of a lot easier than u can a number 1 center . Jarmo knows that this team most likely is a number 1 center away from being a legit threat in the playoffs . Ideally I would prefer Murray and Bjorkstrand to Colorado, rather than Milano though, and I don’t see anyway they move Carlsson instead of Murray , because of future cap hits . The money in future won’t be there to resign Murray , keep Savard , resign Werenski, and pay Jones .
Probably both. It's not the first time they've been paired together in those situations. They play really well together and with Murray being one of our best dmen so far it's a no brainier to put them on the ice to close the game.Was the Jones-Murray combo to create a shut down pairing or a pairing resulting from the rotational shifts because of having only five Dmen?