GDT: Game 37 | Blue Jackets at Bruins | 12/28 7 PM | The Rematch

[Indy18]

At least Bengals won

Oh good...atleast now they have like a 5% chance to make the playoffs

 

[Iron Balls McGinty]

Oh good...atleast now they have like a 5% chance to make the playoffs

Well, that's what it was last week so at least it's still a chance.

 

[thebus88]

Unlucky a little for Fabbro, although he’s probably trying to make the fancy play there.

Riiighhtttt

If that was Severson.

Same with the bad plays Provorov makes.

CRICKETS

But if it’s Severson.

And many of his passes that are “off”, are just as much of a responsibility on the players receiving the pass.

Anyways

 

[Double-Shift Lasse]

Riiighhtttt

If that was Severson.

Same with the bad plays Provorov makes.

CRICKETS

But if it’s Severson.

And many of his passes that are “off”, are just as much of a responsibility on the players receiving the pass.

Anyways

Read all of my posting on Severson. Read all of it on Fabbro.

To always assume persecution, of yourself or of some player you’ve decided needs defending, seems like a rough way to live.

 

[NotWendell]

Oh good...atleast now they have like a 5% chance to make the playoffs

It's up to 11% now. The CBJ would be a playoff team if they never had to play on the road.

 

[thebus88]

Read all of my posting on Severson. Read all of it on Fabbro.

To always assume persecution, of yourself or of some player you’ve decided needs defending, seems like a rough way to live.

Severson absolutely needs and deserves defending at this point.

Do you think every reply to each individual is only meant for or directed towards the person being responded to? Or is it logical to possibly believe there is a message being sent to a group of individuals that will also see said posts?

There’s plenty of others, other than myself, who need to take a look in the mirror regarding “persecution”. Let’s look at your reply. Your response had NOTHING to do with the opinion itself. Just more “personal attacks”, as usual, because you feel attacked somehow.

Anyways I don’t care enough. If I did, I’d be looking back at who all these people trashing Severson have been penciling in next to Werenski to start the year on the top pairing the last few years.

 

[Double-Shift Lasse]

Severson absolutely needs and deserves defending at this point.

Do you think every reply to each individual is only meant for or directed towards the person being responded to? Or is it logical to possibly believe there is a message being sent to a group of individuals that will also see said posts?

There’s plenty of others, other than myself, who need to take a look in the mirror regarding “persecution”. Let’s look at your reply. Your response had NOTHING to do with the opinion itself. Just more “personal attacks”, as usual, because you feel attacked somehow.

Anyways I don’t care enough. If I did, I’d be looking back at who all these people trashing Severson have been penciling in next to Werenski to start the year on the top pairing the last few years.

Look man, you’re the one who made my post about Fabbro about Severson. You quoted it, and replied to it in a post with no other quoted posts.

I mean, if our basic understandings about forum use is that not “every reply to each individual is only meant for or directed towards the person being responded to,” as you suggest, then why would you assume my reply was only meant for you and not “a group of individuals that will also see such posts”?

And yet here we are, you simultaneously telling me not to presume what you meant but also presuming what I meant, without a stop or irony.

At least you don’t care enough.

 

[VT]

Unfortunately, due to health reasons, I was unable to watch, and won't be able to watch for a while yet, the night games that start at 1.00 AM for me.

But from what I am reading, Adam Fantilli looked pretty good. Is that true?

 

[thebus88]

Look man, you’re the one who made my post about Fabbro about Severson. You quoted it, and replied to it in a post with no other quoted posts.

I mean, if our basic understandings about forum use is that not “every reply to each individual is only meant for or directed towards the person being responded to,” as you suggest, then why would you assume my reply was only meant for you and not “a group of individuals that will also see such posts”?

And yet here we are, you simultaneously telling me not to presume what you meant but also presuming what I meant, without a stop or irony.

At least you don’t care enough.

It was a terrible pass, made at a terrible time, to a guy in a terrible position to receive a pass, made by a guy that only a TINY fraction seem to highlight or notice when he makes a mistake or seem to think he isn’t a acceptable long term top pairing partner with Werenski, after being picked up off waivers.

While every single questionable decision or poorly executed play by Severson is proof he’s some terrible player and needs a be removed from the team.

Yes, I responded to your post because I thought it was a bit “humorous” to downplay how bad the pass was or bring “luck” into it, when Severson would have quite literally had an entire page dedicated to him if he made a similar play.

Do I need to tag the dozens of people every post I want to make to defend Severson?

 

[Double-Shift Lasse]

You see how we’re actually talking about the same thing now? That’s quality moderation if you ask me.

 

[ThirdPeriodTurtle]

But from what I am reading, Adam Fantilli looked pretty good. Is that true?

Nobody looked good in the 4-0 Boston loss. It was a very different game compared to the 6-2 win. I don't remember anything about Adam's game standing out in the loss.

 

[CBJ goalie]

Amazing what momentum and bounces can do.
Tarasov doesn't bobble that first puck that lead to the Bruins first goal, and CBJ possibly strike first.

 

[majormajor]

Amazing what momentum and bounces can do.
Tarasov doesn't bobble that first puck that lead to the Bruins first goal, and CBJ possibly strike first.

The first half of the game could have gone either way.

But I find the second half of the game inexcusable. So the cute plays stop working, how about putting pucks behind them and getting a forecheck going?

Teams will realize that they don't want to trade chances with us and more of them will focus on playing tight defensive games in the neutral zone, and when that happens we need a plan B.