GDT: Game 36. Sharks @ McJesus' Drops 1pm

DG93

Registered User
Jun 29, 2010
4,851
3,065
San Jose
Here's a hot take: the best the Sharks looked line-up wise was when Goodrow was injured. Warso stopped galaxy braining his lines, and what he created worked. The Granlund-Smith pairing worked (they need a good F1, Kovalenko would work here). Macklin and Eklund were paired up (give them Zetterlund or Toffoli as a scorer) and the third line anchored by Wennberg and one of Zetterlund/Toffoli (+Kunin, for example) takes the hard matchups and gets caved. Every time Goodrow is healthy, Warso puts him on a line where he doesn't belong and it has a domino effect of making multiple guys look worse.
 

Star Platinum

Registered User
May 11, 2024
1,145
1,787
It's one game, and with the season almost half over, we are on the bottom three in points percentage, essentially tied with the other two.

I do not understand why people keep overreacting over individual games when we have consistently been in the absolute bottom group by points percentage all year.
alastor-moody-constant-vigilance.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: karltonian

tahoesharksfan

Old Timer
Apr 29, 2014
2,471
1,787
The Lake
Signs of commitment but not enough to make a difference. At least they didn’t stink it up in this one.

My biggest disappointment today was to find out that western bias was no longer our SNOG leader! ;) 🤷‍♂️
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Star Platinum

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
71,842
15,692
Folsom
Here's a hot take: the best the Sharks looked line-up wise was when Goodrow was injured. Warso stopped galaxy braining his lines, and what he created worked. The Granlund-Smith pairing worked (they need a good F1, Kovalenko would work here). Macklin and Eklund were paired up (give them Zetterlund or Toffoli as a scorer) and the third line anchored by Wennberg and one of Zetterlund/Toffoli (+Kunin, for example) takes the hard matchups and gets caved. Every time Goodrow is healthy, Warso puts him on a line where he doesn't belong and it has a domino effect of making multiple guys look worse.
If they’re ready to make line changes, I’d be fine with a setup like:

Eklund-Celebrini-Kovalenko
Zetterlund-Wennberg-Toffoli
Kunin-Granlund-Smith
Grundstrom-Sturm-Dellandrea

It won’t win them many games but we can see if Smith can find his game.
 

karltonian

Registered User
Jan 1, 2023
2,469
2,994
True, but he got back and they did get settled in the D zone. Mcdavid and Draisaitl just made a really good play.
they actually had that play diagnosed, arguably it was celebrini getting his stick on the puck that changed up its speed and asky had slid a bit too far by the time it reached him. that's twice tonight he actually beat the puck across but had made too aggressive of a move and let the puck in. that seems like a learning experience.
 

mogambomoroo

Registered User
Sponsor
Oct 12, 2020
1,930
3,295
If they’re ready to make line changes, I’d be fine with a setup like:

Eklund-Celebrini-Kovalenko
Zetterlund-Wennberg-Toffoli
Kunin-Granlund-Smith
Grundstrom-Sturm-Dellandrea

It won’t win them many games but we can see if Smith can find his game.
I like the pair system, Eklund - Celebrini, Wennberg - Toffoli and Granlund - Smith have worked together well.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad