- Jan 18, 2012
- 35,240
- 53,879
I mean, I would take a neutered Wilson over a reckless Lemmy.Unpopular take... I rather have a reckless player like Wilson than a neutered Lemmy.
obviously minus the dirty/intent to injure plays
Wilson is actually a good player when he's on the ice too.Unpopular take... I rather have a reckless player like Wilson than a neutered Lemmy.
obviously minus the dirty/intent to injure plays
I'm talking about how they play. You're taking away a major aspect to why they are valuableI mean, I would take a neutered Wilson over a reckless Lemmy.
It's just not a fair comparison. 1st liner vs 4th liner.
Such low energy in here..
![]()
Yeah, I guess an "un-neutered Lemmy, cannot score like Wilson can. A no brainer. Suspensions or not.Unpopular take... I rather have a reckless player like Wilson than a neutered Lemmy.
obviously minus the dirty/intent to injure plays
It's not just about skill. Wilson's physicality accomplishes tangible things on the ice.I'm talking about how they play. You're taking away a major aspect to why they are valuable
I'm not comparing them skill wise.
He really is very good. Playing physical is one thing but you need to stay on the ice.
Lemmy used to be like that... he was effectiveIt's not just about skill. Wilson's physicality accomplishes tangible things on the ice.