OverTheLine
Registered User
- May 11, 2011
- 215
- 305
I mean, he is the father of the guy who saved us from Skynet.i firmly believe kyle connor is not a bigger star because his name is so incredibly generic.
The spacing on that 3 on 1 was so terrible he pretty much had to shoot.I'm laughing so f***ing hard, Zetterlund peeped Goodrow as his passing option and ripped it top shelf immediately.
Drury is so out of his mind he’d probably do it for BordeleauWould honestly trade for Kakko just so I don’t have to see Goodrow that high in the lineup ever again.
Yeah, I wanted to win this one too, even though I worried it would lead to too many more wins. They played really well for the most part.I know ya'll are happy for the tank results and I get it but would've loved to see them pull through with this one, they played really well. Georgiev is definitely bad, I suspect we could've won that one with Blackwood.
Schaefer will be gone by the third pick IMOI would almost rather us have the #3 pick so we can get Schaefer.
Defense gave up as many goals as Georgiev.Tough loss. Skaters played better than this. Georgiev not good enough...
Can't even blame Georgiev that much tbh. Rutta and Ferraro have to go eventually.Defense gave up as many goals as Georgiev.
I think he could have been better on the 1st one as he dove early/baited but the other 3 weren’t really ones I expect to be saved.Defense gave up as many goals as Georgiev.
Hagens and Martone are going 1 and 2 unless Schaefer really blows upSchaefer will be gone by the third pick IMO
Kovalenko 5 points and plus 2 in 3 games with the sharks.
After 3 games he is already a quarter of the way to where i figured would be a good total point wise fir the eason for him.
It's a tough December and we just took one of the top teams to the last minute. It would be better to force them to overtime, but it's not like we got caved. The kids will definitely be able to take positives from that game. If we win every third game versus a top team, it's excellent for picking one more top player while also teaching the kids how to win hard games.Honestly, I do not like the 'Best Tank Result' point of view/way of thinking.
The kids need to experience winning, regardless of whether it's close or not. This is exactly how teams stay perpetually bad.
I get it, we are still very young, and early in the rebuild, but it is not like we started a couple years ago. We are about to be year 6 without making the playoffs. It is time that we started winning these close games to give the kids some much needed confidence.
Edit: I know we aren't going to make the playoffs this year, and that it has been a step forward so far, I would rather have us continue playing .450 hockey, rather than going on very extended losing streaks.
The reason teams like buffalo can't get out of the constant rebuild phase is because they tried to jump a few steps in the rebuild to reach the playoffs before they were actually ready for it.Honestly, I do not like the 'Best Tank Result' point of view/way of thinking.
The kids need to experience winning, regardless of whether it's close or not. This is exactly how teams stay perpetually bad.
I get it, we are still very young, and early in the rebuild, but it is not like we started a couple years ago. We are about to be year 6 without making the playoffs. It is time that we started winning these close games to give the kids some much needed confidence.
Edit: I know we aren't going to make the playoffs this year, and that it has been a step forward so far, I would rather have us continue playing .450 hockey, rather than going on very extended losing streaks.