GDT: Game 32: Columbus vs. Chicago | 12/20 7PM EST

[Samkow]

Do they still have that stupid "Goalie Interference has to be called on the ice immediatly" rule? Only explanation I can think of for that call.

 

[Aela*]

**** Crawford, get shots on him and he'll crumble. This ain't over yet.

 

[Double-Shift Lasse]

shouldn't be allowed because the dumbs slid right into bob and stopped him from playing the puck. Rimer and Jody spend 5 minutes talking about the wrong thing and deciding it should be a goal.

Hawks announcers did exact same. Seriously...

 

[CBJx614]

They seriously need to ****ing fine Krueger for that, that **** is NOT acceptable. I would be furious if I was Bobrovsky. He clear as day slide into the crease feet first.

 

[EspenK]

No. It shouldn't.. the Hawk guy was on Bob

I was referring to the call on the ice. The call wasn't goalie interference which is a different argument. I was merely saying that it went in off a stick not the kick. Toronto can't call a penalty only rule on the on ice call.

 

[Aela*]

**** stop giving the god damn ****ing puck up you ****ing idiots.

 

[Jackets Fan]

On the last 2 views, it looked like Smith's stick touched Bob's pad, not the puck. Either way, Toronto f**ks us again. What a surprise.

 

[Mayor Bee]

That would result in an automatic double play if you tried it in baseball. Ty Cobb would be proud of the takeout though.

 

[MFRONE]

There was no clear shot that showed a stick knock it in. You could assume it did but unless it is 100% clear as day, you can't change that call.

 

[JeffP]

dal/stl fan here- not sure of the details on it, but it felt like interference to me. maybe just due to it not being the last touch? regardless, go CBJ

 

[EspenK]

It sure as heck looked to me like it went in off a stick. But regardless it counted.

 

[Aela*]

Jesus **** Wiz way to throw the puck away with no thought of what you're doing at all. :

 

[NotWendell]

Rooney screws us every time he works one of our games.

 

[Bobcat110]

dal/stl fan here- not sure of the details on it, but it felt like interference to me. maybe just due to it not being the last touch? regardless, go CBJ

Yeah...even the Hawks fans are saying that was a BS goal...but hey...it's the CBJ...so who TF cares.

 

[Aela*]

There was no clear shot that showed a stick knock it in. You could assume it did but unless it is 100% clear as day, you can't change that call.

Watching it in slow mo they freeze framed it and it definitely looked like his stick touched it. That's all that's needed.

 

[db2011]

I don't even understand why that wasn't called interference immediately. A play as bad as that should not be rewarded at all. What could possibly have come of that?

I mean in real life, not NHL referee life

 

[CBJx614]

We need to play like we did against Washington, just start going through everything not wearing union blue.

 

[Aela*]

Definitely should have been a ****ing goalie interference call though.

 

[VABUCK]

Watching it in slow mo they freeze framed it and it definitely looked like his stick touched it. That's all that's needed.

No what was needed was the interference call! It was obvious!

 

[Aela*]

At least Cam knows what to do when he gets the puck in the d-zone.

 

[Aela*]

No what was needed was the interference call! It was obvious!

Agreed 100%.

 

[Halfboard]

"The crowd on their feet!" says Rimer as they show ONE guy standing up......

 

[Samkow]

"The crowd on their feet!" says Rimer as they show ONE guy standing up......

Yeah, embarrassing cutaway.

 

[CBJx614]

"The crowd on their feet!" says Rimer as they show ONE guy standing up......

 

[MFRONE]

That wasn't hooking, he lifted his stick