1. What kind of hockey do you want, a shootout loss or a regulation loss?
2. Who said Nash was going to be replaced by hard workers? As for his replacements what are your comments about Artem Anisimov in game one?
3. Umberger is an issue but he has 198 points in four seasons as a Blue Jacket, have you watched any of his games?
4. The defense could have been better tonight but saying they never covered the backend all night could be debated, I saw them cover the backend several times...
5. Brassard outlasting Nash and Voracek is a ridiculous comment; there is no comparison between those players… different skills, different pay and different times. The simplistic comparion is that they are first round picks, if that's your reason you got that right.
6. Johansen was good again-you got that right Doug…
7. The other guy’s name I think you are talking about is Brandon Dubinsky, a guy the head coach said played well in game one even though he wasn’t noticed….
Your assessment of tonight’s game was horrible…..
1: Would rather have a shoot out loss, but what does that have to do with anything?
2: Who said Nash was going to be replaced by hardworkers? You are joking right? Anisimov is fine, but Dubinsky has been awful, and lazy.
3: I've watched all of Umberger's games, Umberger has sucked since he's been here, never been a fan of him or his game. He's a third liner being sold as a top liner. Can't stand the love affair of that guy. He's no more of a hard worker than a guy like Nash was.
4: You're joking right? The backdoor play was open all night, the score would have been 14-3 had not for Bob making many cross crease saves. They got sucked over to one side of the ice constantly. Defense chased the puck carrier all night.
5: Brassard outlasting Nash and Voracek is a ridiculous comment? I meant by draft position but I do understand a valid point there. Brassard likely has next to no value and is being paid a decent amount so you are probably right there isn't a good comparison outside of draft position.
6: I know.
7: I don't care what Shrek, I mean Todd Richards has to say. They've also always told us Nash was a great leader, blah blah blah, now the players come out with comments like removing the country club atmosphere, creating the offense the right way etc. If Todd Richards really believes Dubinsky is playing well, then he needs his eyes corrected.
Your analysis of my analysis is horrible. I'm confident in saying that Detroit was awful and last nights game looked like a high school hockey game with all the chasing the puck carrier, lazy passes, horrible passes to nobody, horrible passes to the middle of the ice, horrible chips off the wall in the defensive zone. With that said I can still give this club the benefit of the doubt considering the extremely high roster turnover with not training camp and preseason. I just didn't see any reason last night to believe this team is anything more than a bottom feeder. They may have resolve but right now offensively I can't see this team finishing in the top 13 in the west.