GDT: Game 19: Sharks @ Penguins 4:00pm NBCSCA

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
71,563
15,237
Folsom
Great effort to come back. Their compete level is at least more consistent than last season. That was a game that could’ve easily got away from them. They aren’t the worst team in the league right now and have room to grow with the kids getting more valuable experience. Keep Smith with Celebrini. It’s the best he looked all year.

If Vanecek is injured, put him on IR now and call up Askarov. Give him this week where you start him Monday and Thursday. If Vanecek is ready, he’s got a week to recover.
 

coooldude

Registered User
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2007
4,526
5,546
Well, at least I called OT!

Glad we lost the shootout. Would be nice to see Smith or Celly bury one but would rather give PIT the point. Could matter down the road. I'd like to see our wins come in trap games vs top teams, please.

The Celebrini Smith connection looks solid, but it is an adventure, and does kind of bork up the line options otherwise. I'm sure mack is getting antsy with a 4? game pointless streak, but the points will come. He's getting he's feet under him still.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan

Anomie2029

Registered User
Oct 10, 2013
4,046
4,445
Melbourne, Australia
Great effort. This team is definitely much more competitive. 1-2-1 would have been acceptable after going down 0-3. Credit them for deciding they had more to give.

Blackwood was excellent, the kids looked good, Lund line looked good, good to have Walman back, and Tofolli line performed well. Team definitely needs one more top 6 forward, but they look like they almost have four competent lines.

Definitely game for Rutta to come out for Thompson.
I mean, I’m at the point where Ferraro looks worse than Rutta.
Ferraro has made every Dman he has been paired with this season look bad.

How Warsofsky can be looking to put Walman back in the lineup and take out Thompson shows his evaluation of his players is extremely poor.
 

drunksage

Sphere = underrated?
Jan 13, 2007
19,033
2,396
30-ish min from Sphere
SNOG announcement

One correct goalscorer was the difference in determining tonight's SNOG.

SNOG
Penguins 4 (Crosby, Malkin, Karlsson, Nieto
Sharks 3 (Kostin, Eklund, Liljegren)

Congrats @PattyLafontaine on your first SNOG of the season and second career SNOG!

SNOG 2023-10-27 PattyLafontaine.jpg


#
Date / Opponent
SNOG Winner(s)
Result
1Oct. 10 vs BluesnoneBlues 5-4 OT
2Oct. 12 vs DucksnoneDucks 2-0
3Oct. 15 at Starsweastern biasStars 3-2 SO
4Oct. 17 at Blackhawksweastern biasBlackhawks 4-2
5Oct. 18 at JetsnoneJets 8-3
6Oct. 20 vs AvalanchenoneAvalanche 4-1
7Oct. 22 at DucksTimo TimeDucks 3-1
8Oct. 24 at KingsFridayKings 3-2
9Oct. 26 at VGKnoneVGK 7-3
10Oct. 28 at UtahnoneSharks 5-4 OT
11Oct. 29 vs KingsMackAttack71, bluefunnel, sharks_dynastySharks 4-2
12Oct. 31 vs BlackhawksnoneSharks 3-2
13Nov. 2 vs CanucksnoneCanucks 3-2
14Nov. 5 vs Blue JacketsnoneSharks 2-1 OT
15Nov. 7 vs Wildtimorous meWild 5-2
16Nov. 10 at DevilsnoneSharks 1-0
17Nov. 11 at FlyersTheBigDrunkPandaFlyers 4-3 SO
18Nov. 14 at RangersnoneRangers 3-2
19Nov. 16 at PenguinsPattyLafontainePenguins 4-3 SO


Rank
2024-25 SNOG standings
# of SNOGs
1.weastern bias2
T-2.bluefunnel, Friday, MackAttack71, PattyLafontaine, sharks_dynasty, TheBigDrunkPanda, Timo Time, timorous me1
 

Skeksis25

Registered User
Feb 17, 2023
308
683
North Brunswick, NJ
It makes me irrationally angry every time I hear Drew praise a vet for working hard or being just NASA scientist levels of smart for doing the most basic things, never call them out for their numerous awful plays, but starts nitpicking every little thing Smith or Macklin does.
 

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
71,563
15,237
Folsom
View attachment 931781
Another game, another stat card showing how awful Ferraro is.

But he’ll keep being gifted games and receive absolutely zero criticism from the Sharks beat reporters.
Until they think Mukhamadullin or Cagnoni are ready, Ferraro isn’t going anywhere. His extra year while playing this bad means we’re stuck with him. Only way that changes is if they play him. Thompson should be in the lineup over Rutta despite his good game card today.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DG93

DG93

Registered User
Jun 29, 2010
4,808
2,997
San Jose
View attachment 931781
Another game, another stat card showing how awful Ferraro is.

But he’ll keep being gifted games and receive absolutely zero criticism from the Sharks beat reporters.
New slogan: piss poor play doesn't mean shit if you bring leadership, energy, and grit...heh

In all seriousness though, good to see yet another comeback in a game that they 100% would've lost 5-1 last year. Blackwood was awesome again, and I like the Celebrini-Smith combination although it'd be nice if the third guy on that line wasn't a black hole offensively like Goodrow. Dellandrea had a good game today, so it'd be nice if Goodrow and Dellandrea got flipped (assuming Warso wants Wennberg-Toffoli anchoring the third line).
 

Juxtaposer

Outro: Divina Comedia
Dec 21, 2009
50,066
23,726
Bay Area
View attachment 931781
Another game, another stat card showing how awful Ferraro is.

But he’ll keep being gifted games and receive absolutely zero criticism from the Sharks beat reporters.
I think we have a big enough sample size to say that Ferraro was the problem on the Ferraro-Rutta pairing. Obviously Rutta is not very good but I think he's a passable #6. He was pretty solid with Mukhamadullin last year in those three games, I'd like to see it again.
 

DG93

Registered User
Jun 29, 2010
4,808
2,997
San Jose
I think we have a big enough sample size to say that Ferraro was the problem on the Ferraro-Rutta pairing. Obviously Rutta is not very good but I think he's a passable #6. He was pretty solid with Mukhamadullin last year in those three games, I'd like to see it again.
And his best results have unsurprisingly come while paired with Thompson and Walman (limited sample size), so if you pair Rutta with a puck mover, he's a passable defenseman.
 

Star Platinum

Registered User
May 11, 2024
826
1,184
Why in the world is Goodrow on PP1??
Because we don't have 10 good offensive players on our squad.

Man, the number of times a Sharks player has gained the zone cleanly and looked back and had absolutely zero support in this game is infuriating. How does that keep happening??
Cause we wear ourselves out in our own zone and are constantly needing line changes
 

JoeThorntonsRooster

Don’t say eye test when you mean points
May 14, 2012
33,457
25,655
Fremont, CA
View attachment 931781
Another game, another stat card showing how awful Ferraro is.

But he’ll keep being gifted games and receive absolutely zero criticism from the Sharks beat reporters.
Interesting to see individual offense is a positive for Liljegren, but team offense is a negative. Visibly, he was very involved and active offensively, and this kind of shows the limitation of the team portion of the player cards. They're obviously still useful as a one game summary though.

Love seeing Walman pick right up where he left off. He probably has a case for team MVP thus far.

I'm so glad we suck in the shootout, always lame to get extra points in a useless skills contest.

I love the positive spin, but I kinda want them to pick up points at least for a little while. I want the players to believe, for as long as possible, that they can sneak into the playoffs if they go on a run.
 
  • Like
Reactions: timorous me

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad