Catanddogguitarrr
Registered User
4th or whatever, he's not doing enough.4th line Center. A defensive center. Not like he's paid to put up points like at least four other veterans we could talk about.
4th or whatever, he's not doing enough.4th line Center. A defensive center. Not like he's paid to put up points like at least four other veterans we could talk about.
Keep driving that value up, Hoffman. He has 6 pts in his last 6 GP. And tonight isn't over yet.
I'm grilling some steaks!
The other lines are actually looking decent for once... So they probably are waiting for Armia to replace Pezz and have 4 decent linesSlag looking better and better. Come on Marty, take off the shackles.
4th or whatever, he's not doing enough.
Lol, I was expecting we need to tank.Riiiiiight. Because every player needs to be Mario Lemieux. He's a shutdown guy. I'm not worried about Evans.
but hate them using Suzuki as the bumper.love Dach at the point for the PP
We should extend his contract !Keep driving that value up, Hoffman. He has 6 pts in his last 6 GP. And tonight isn't over yet.
I cant believe I was even a fraction bit iffy with the 3.36M lol, for 4 years we're laughing honestly
And still RFA after
An "oh" when they see a Hab entering the zone with the puck and an "ah" when they realize it's Gally.I’m surprised how the crowd still oohs and ahs when Gally comes down wing, as if ANYTHING is gonna happen
They first decided if the puck indeed crossed the line. It took a while to confirm that the puck did indeed cross the line. The challenge was for goalie interference, i.e. did the puck cross the line in a legal manner.How in the world a goal/no goal decision depends on who challenged it? Ridiculous
Spend few minutes looking at it at first and decide a good goal, then when the coach challenges it, decide a no-goal after 20 seconds..
Makes no effing sense
Dont get me wrong I know its not a goal, the process is ridiculous
He's the only panel member worth listening to.I don't use the AINEC thing very often but Bieksa is by far the smartest person on the HNIC panel AINEC.
I absolutely hate it. He's not willing to shoot. You need a dual threat manning the point on a PP.love Dach at the point for the PP
Why not look at the interference too in the first review? Are they automats with no judgement?They first decided if the puck indeed crossed the line. It took a while to confirm that the puck did indeed cross the line. The challenge was for goalie interference, i.e. did the puck cross the line in a legal manner.
I don't mind Jen either, at times.He's the only panel member worth listening to.
give him some time to adjust to this roleI absolutely hate it. He's not willing to shoot. You need a dual threat manning the point on a PP.
Because the initial call on the ice was no goal.Why not look at the interference too in the first review? Are they automats with no judgement?
If he starts shooting, sure. Would much rather see Guhle manning the point.give him some time to adjust to this role