I respectfully disagree - this team needs a new group behind the bench - a group that is capable of having a system in which the players we have buy into - a group that doesn’t show favors - a group that has this team prepared to play a full 60 minutes and they start the second when the puck drops.it has nothing to do with coaching. we have just 5-7 players on the whole roster that can make and recieve passes. there is no coach in this world that can get something out of this team.
But it’s happening more frequently than what it should be and it has been since Blashill was here.We have won when we should have lost and now we lost when we should have won. Very disappointing but it happens to every team
I think it is fair to call for a coaching change at this point. I certainly would favor it. That said, I think you need to be realistic about how much it will change this team. I am very much convinced that regardless of who we have running the show, this team will struggle to transition the puck out of the defensive zone and will continue to turn over pucks in the defensive zone. No system is going to fully offset the lack of quality centers on this roster, especially on the second line and 1/2 of our blueline (who simply can't retrieve and move pucks no matter how you look at it). I think a successful coaching change would put us back around where we were last year (perhaps a tad better). It is not going to put us in the top 10 of the league if that is what people are expecting.I respectfully disagree - this team needs a new group behind the bench - a group that is capable of having a system in which the players we have buy into - a group that doesn’t show favors - a group that has this team prepared to play a full 60 minutes and they start the second when the puck drops.
What we have is a group of coaches who apparently have no system in place (at least that’s what my aging eyes tell me) and losing in the most obscene fashion is the norm and it’s tolerated (again with the eye test).
While not elite - this roster has the capacity to perform at a much higher level and with considerably better consistency - we’re not seeing that.
But it’s happening more frequently than what it should be and it has been since Blashill was here.
I honestly feel this team should have made the playoffs last season had it not been for the excessive losing streaks and horrific inconsistency and that usually falls upon the coaching staff.
He should in no way get an extension under any circumstance. Tandem needs to be Talbot and Cossa next yearB2B games. Cam is playing tonight against the tougher opponent.
Fester's contract expires end of season, he'll start Cam as much as possible from here on out. It's clearly obvious who the best goalie is.
Meanwhile Lyon is playing himself out of a contract extension.
It's looking that way....He should in no way get an extension under any circumstance. Tandem needs to be Talbot and Cossa next year
I know it is b2b games. But my point was that we had no chance winning vs the kings, so he should have played Lyon vs kings. Talbot wins the game vs the ducksB2B games. Cam is playing tonight against the tougher opponent.
Fester's contract expires end of season, he'll start Cam as much as possible from here on out. It's clearly obvious who the best goalie is.
Meanwhile Lyon is playing himself out of a contract extension.
I wonder if Coaches actually do think like this lolI know it is b2b games. But my point was that we had no chance winning vs the kings, so he should have played Lyon vs kings. Talbot wins the game vs the ducks
would have played talbot vs ducks too. wonder if talbot wanted to play his old team or they thought he might want to.I know it is b2b games. But my point was that we had no chance winning vs the kings, so he should have played Lyon vs kings. Talbot wins the game vs the ducks
Maybe. But I thought this could be a turning point for the team and I thought 5 points was realistic. When we won vs the pens I thought even 6 points vs realistic. I just thought we would definitely lose to the kings. I thought Lyon struggled a bit before the injury and I preferred to play Talbot vs the ducks as Talbot has been our best player so far this season.would have played talbot vs ducks too. wonder if talbot wanted to play his old team or they thought he might want to.
I know it is b2b games. But my point was that we had no chance winning vs the kings, so he should have played Lyon vs kings. Talbot wins the game vs the ducks
I wonder if Coaches actually do think like this lol
Maybe. But I thought this could be a turning point for the team and I thought 5 points was realistic. When we won vs the pens I thought even 6 points vs realistic. I just thought we would definitely lose to the kings. I thought Lyon struggled a bit before the injury and I preferred to play Talbot vs the ducks as Talbot has been our best player so far this season.
Now we have 2 points after 3 games. There are just 2 teams behind us in the standings and I don't see this team higher than 10 in the conference. The question is whether Yzerman should tank this season.
I wanted to start Talbot and secure 2 points vs the ducks. Even though Lyon allowed a soft 1st goal the team took the 3-1 lead and had the control of the game, but then Lyon allowed 2 softish goals and we lost Edvidsson, and it was end for the team.I'm sure Fester was giving himself the best chance at winning both games, not just one. The Kings aren't that amazing. Kopitar is 37 and still their best player. Rittich has been a backup goalie the past 4 season. Plus it gives Cam an extra day rest between starts.
Things get interesting next week when the Wings play basically every other day for 3 weeks. Does Cam get ALL of the starts?
Coaches make goalie decisions based on opponents all the time. I don't think Fester wanted to concede the LA game like he did with the Rangers by starting Husso.
Despite this game, Talbot still has a winning record at 5-3-1. I don't see Stevie tanking unless Cam falls apart.
Talbot has been our best player so far and without him we would be the last in the conference.I'm sure Fester was giving himself the best chance at winning both games, not just one. The Kings aren't that amazing. Kopitar is 37 and still their best player. Rittich has been a backup goalie the past 4 season. Plus it gives Cam an extra day rest between starts.
Things get interesting next week when the Wings play basically every other day for 3 weeks. Does Cam get ALL of the starts?
Coaches make goalie decisions based on opponents all the time. I don't think Fester wanted to concede the LA game like he did with the Rangers by starting Husso.
Despite this game, Talbot still has a winning record at 5-3-1. I don't see Stevie tanking unless Cam falls apart.
Damn it, someone tell Cam he's messing up our draft pick! He needs to get one the same page as his teammates and suck.Talbot has been our best player so far and without him we would be the last in the conference.