GDT: GAME 16 | Philly Flies into O-town | Thu Nov 14 2024, 7PM | TSN5, RDS2

[Micklebot]

Ullmark lost us that one, should have been 4-2 for Ottawa but Linus shat the bed

Honestly, I think the only really bad goal in regulation was the first one, a breakaway, a two on one rebound goal, and a one timer from a pass that started on the far side and was touch passed to the goal scorer from the slot, those are all scoring chances, sure you'd like him to make a big save on one or two of them, but they weren't bad goals per say.

Game probably should have been a 4-3 win, or a 5-4 win in OT/SO and I would have been ok with it. That OT goal though, that can't get through you like that when you're in position, same goes for the 1st goal,

 

[The Waffler]

He was .957 vs Tampa in his previous start...so he was "Coming in Hot" as they say

Well, honestly I’m not sure where I got .750 from. I may have exaggerated, which is obviously not something I’m known for.

Come on now, we scored 4 on him, he had an .892 sv% on the game, he looked like a competent goalie, nothing more, nothing less.

I will not come on now, he looked pretty good despite the numbers. All 4 goals were grade A chances that even the best goalies would have a hard time saving.

 

[Micklebot]

Well, honestly I’m not sure where I got .750 from. I may have exaggerated, which is obviously not something I’m known for.



I will not come on now, he looked pretty good despite the numbers. All 4 goals were grade A chances that even the best goalies would have a hard time saving.

Sure, the goals we scored were not ones I expect him to save, but he also wasn't robing us looking like Shesterkin, which was your claim. Shesterkin steals goals that you'd think were sure things. We did not make him look like that, we scored on those chances.

 

[The Waffler]

Sure, the goals we scored were not ones I expect him to save, but he also wasn't robing us looking like Shesterkin, which was your claim. Shesterkin steals goals that you'd think were sure things. We did not make him look like that, we scored on those chances.

No no, the point I think I was making originally was that the Ottawa guys weren’t making his life or the Philly D-men’s lives hard, and therefore made him look better than he was. With a touch of hyperbole for the rizz.

They definitely beat him clean on the goals with great looks, but he made like 30 something other saves. He was good, and made some really good saves in OT. They should have had more on him early in the game with all the O-zone momentum they generated.

Beyond that, the point I was making was that the loss is on the skaters almost as much as it’s on the goalie.

 

[lang006]

Torts quotes are the best. Get so cranky and annoyed when the questions are asked. Reporter: "what is it you're seeing about Fedotov as he is settling in to the net here?"... Torts: "He is stopping the puck"

 

[Xspyrit]

I think Ullmark has some leeway and is getting the « benefit of the doubt » because of what he did in Boston but any other goalie would have been crucified by this fanbase. As crazy as it sounds, here’s how I rank our goalies since Craig Anderson :

1- Anders Nilsson
2- Anton Forsberg
3- Matt Murray
Etc

I really want to see Ullmark climb his way to the top. It’s crucial that he does; particularly with the contract we just gave him; and that’s without considering the acquisition cost. It’s basically all we have left from a 7th OA pick and a second.

Sure, the goals we scored were not ones I expect him to save, but he also wasn't robing us looking like Shesterkin, which was your claim. Shesterkin steals goals that you'd think were sure things. We did not make him look like that, we scored on those chances.

To be fair, he made some very tough saves. I think one on Stutzle and one on Norris. The toughest saves are not necessarily the flashiest ones, but it’s the sneaky good shots that you have to save with your shoulder or the shaft of your stick… or deflections through traffic, point blank one timers, or when the shooter has way too much time and space

 

[Dionysus]

No no, the point I think I was making originally was that the Ottawa guys weren’t making his life or the Philly D-men’s lives hard, and therefore made him look better than he was. With a touch of hyperbole for the rizz.

They definitely beat him clean on the goals with great looks, but he made like 30 something other saves. He was good, and made some really good saves in OT. They should have had more on him early in the game with all the O-zone momentum they generated.

Beyond that, the point I was making was that the loss is on the skaters almost as much as it’s on the goalie.

Guys were definitely spinning away from the front of the net looking for a tip or rebound rather than getting right in front for a screen.

 

[Micklebot]

No no, the point I think I was making originally was that the Ottawa guys weren’t making his life or the Philly D-men’s lives hard, and therefore made him look better than he was. With a touch of hyperbole for the rizz.

They definitely beat him clean on the goals with great looks, but he made like 30 something other saves. He was good, and made some really good saves in OT. They should have had more on him early in the game with all the O-zone momentum they generated.

Beyond that, the point I was making was that the loss is on the skaters almost as much as it’s on the goalie.

So we made him look good by only beating him with the good shots, gotcha...

 

[The Waffler]

So we made him look good by only beating him with the good shots, gotcha...

I feel like I’m not articulating this as well as I should be. He made the saves he needed to, got beat by some ten-bell chances. Until late in the game, where he just shut the door on both Norris and Pinto, who both had Grade-A looks.

But my original post was meant to highlight the defensive play when up 2. Just some poor tracking on both the Richard and Brink goals. Can’t have that.

 

[Gil Gunderson]

Looks like the Canes will be forced to start their third string goalie, so we're in for another fun night of making some nobody look like a superhero.

No Seth Jarvis too.

 

[Hale The Villain]

Coming into the game Fedotov had a .851 SV% through 4 games, but of course he puts up an excellent performance against us.

Not sure if it's just bad luck or the Sens are uniquely bad at finishing on scoring chances.

Annoying either way.

 

[BankStreetParade]

My big concern with wasting away so many points in winnable games is that this level of play won't keep up. They've won 2 of their last 3 but had lost 3 of 4 before that. Are they just having a great stretch of games over the last few? Or is this an aberration to their real level of play and we'll see them regress a bit? It's so hard to figure out who these guys are, except a team that seems to find ways to give away points in games they shouldn't be.

 

[bicboi64]

Coming into the game Fedotov had a .851 SV% through 4 games, but of course he puts up an excellent performance against us.

Not sure if it's just bad luck or the Sens are uniquely bad at finishing on scoring chances.

Annoying either way.

Fedotov was .892 last night. 4 goals should be enough to win the game, especially if we only limit the opposition to only 20 shots

He was marginally better than what he's been his last 4 games. I'd say he was average at best, but our goalie has to be able to put up a better save percentage than .892 every night, let alone the awful .737 Ullmark put up.