GDT: Game 14: New York Rangers vs Columbus Blue Jackets, 7pm ET, MSG

[LeetchisGod]

Hockey is a wonderful sport but the NHL is a horribly run league.

 

[DialUp]

How many goals are we going to score against this team this year isn't the question, it's how many are going to count. 3 to 1 apparently

 

[EdJovanovski]

How the f*** can refs tell it was frozen? Honest question? WTF, it's impossible to tell that from any angle.

Which would mean it’s inconclusive, so call on the ice stands

 

[huerter]

When was the last time we had a goal review go our way?

The last time these two teams played

 

[Rangerboy030]

When was the last time we had a goal review go our way?

Also, was it before or after the Wilson incident?

 

[gabevh3]

Protest this game.

Two egregious calls against this team that are directly affecting the outcome.

No because It won't ruin drurys Christmas.

 

[mike14]

Giving up 2 in 18 seconds isn't a good idea. We need to find a way to play better second periods.
Cuylle's shot was in so f knows what they were actually looking at...
Win the 3rd

 

[irishlaxburger2]

I don't blame the officials. They looked at it for an hour. That's a near-impossible call to make.

This is on the league for still calling it with the naked eye when goal line technology was invented in 2014, and the NHL had prototype puck-tracking in 1996.

This.

They did everything they could do to try to find a view conclusively showing the puck over the line before the whistle was blown. You can easily assume the puck was in, but there was no replay view showing it over the line before the whistle blew. I don’t blame them for this call. They seemingly tried forever to find a view.

 

[RangerLifer]

You just have to laugh at this point with the amount of video reviews that go against us.

It is unreal. We're batting 1000 in reverse.

 

[huerter]

Which would mean it’s inconclusive, so call on the ice stands

Jovo from the clouds with a contribution!

 

[Richard Banger]

Which would mean it’s inconclusive, so call on the ice stands

The whistle was never blown. Puck was never dead. Should of been a goal.

 

[gabevh3]

I actually don't think that was in until Kakko got his stick in there.

Even if so there was no whistle

 

[BlueShirtGal]

 

[will1066]

Kakko the unluckiest player in the history of hockey

Cuylle is convinced Kakko is costing him points

 

[SnowblindNYR]

Which would mean it’s inconclusive, so call on the ice stands

That's not what he said. It was conclusively in you can see it. Shouldn't you be watching the Canucks right now?

 

[KOVALEV022473]

How the f*** can refs tell it was frozen? Honest question? WTF, it's impossible to tell that from any angle.

The initial shot was in! So I don’t know what the f*** they’re claiming was frozen.

 

[irishlaxburger2]

Where was the in-goal camera view? They didn’t show it once on MSG, or on the ref’s iPads.

 

[savebyrichter94]

My reaction to that review

 

[EdJovanovski]

That's not what he said. It was conclusively in you can see it. Shouldn't you be watching the Canucks right now?

I’m a Ranger fan, just not a homer. It wasn’t conclusively in until after the whistle

 

[mrmovies779]

I really hate Mikas line right now.take away the Kreider goal scored off the rush and they have been sloppy and invisible.2 goals that period because of sloppy turnovers.Quick didn't have a chance on 2 of them

 

[LiveLongandProspal]

With the legalization of sports gambling, I really wonder if we'll see a bunch of referees exposed ala Tim Donaghy. The refeering in every major sport has gotten so much worse. SO MUCH worse.




That's really inexcusable. Really. Unbelievable.

 

[Cmox]

Vally’s reaction lol.

 

[TriFF51]

How is there not an in net camera or a high speed camera along the goal line in the modern NHL? Can they not afford this technology for f***s sake?

We get referees squinting at iPads.

 

[Harbour Dog]

Even if so there was no whistle

Then there's the "intent to blow the whistle" clause that they love going back to. I hate the call, but I take issue with the rulebook, not how they interpreted it here.

 

[bleedblue94]

Unfortunately knew that was getting called back when they showed the refs on the pad going back and forth from the shot. There was no clear picture showing the puck go into the net. We all know it was in but they kept looking for an angle to show it actually go in and there wasn't one. Just a rough night for the officiating in this game.