Thats because that is how he wants it pronouncedDan with the Lil-juh-gren and it's throwing me off lol
Thats because that is how he wants it pronounced
No. It is a hit that causes someone to crash into the boards. Usually about 8ft or so out.Walman back on the ice. That's good news.
Does a "boarding" call need to be a hit from behind?
Kind of sad that because he played in the illiterate and useless media hotbed named Toronto he wasn't able to have his name pronounced right for 8 years as a pro hockey player lol.Jumbo should mess with everyone and say that he never corrected anyone for 20 years, but it's actually pronounced "THOW-run-ten"
It's obviously Lil-jeh-gren. Do you remember Remenda's Hertl story? Before the 4-goal game, Hertl asked Drew if he could pronounce his name properly. Internally, Remenda rolled his eyes; "do something in the NHL first". That kind of attitude must be 10x in Toronto.Kind of sad that because he played in the illiterate and useless media hotbed named Toronto he wasn't able to have his name pronounced right for 8 years as a pro hockey player lol.
Does a "boarding" call need to be a hit from behind?
A boarding penalty shall be imposed on any player who
checks or pushes a defenseless opponent in such a manner that
causes the opponent to hit or impact the boards violently or
dangerously. The severity of the penalty, based upon the impact with
the boards, shall be at the discretion of the Referee.
There is an enormous amount of judgment involved in the
application of this rule by the Referees. The onus is on the player
applying the check to ensure his opponent is not in a defenseless
position and if so, he must avoid or minimize contact. However, in
determining whether such contact could have been avoided, the
circumstances of the check, including whether the opponent put
himself in a vulnerable position immediately prior to or simultaneously
with the check or whether the check was unavoidable can be
considered. This balance must be considered by the Referees when
applying this rule.
Any unnecessary contact with a player playing the puck on an
obvious “icing” or “off-side” play which results in that player hitting or
impacting the boards is “boarding” and must be penalized as such. In
other instances where there is no contact with the boards, it should be
treated as “charging.”
No. Any hit into the boards while not up against them can theoretically be boarding. All that's required is that there's space between the player who takes the hit and the boards and the ref determines that the hit was dangerous because it prevented the struck player from protecting themselves before they collide with the boards.
Rule 41 from the NHL rulebook: