GDT: Game 11: Columbus vs. Anaheim | 10/27 6PM EDT

FANonymous

Registered User
Nov 7, 2010
4,911
0
Yeah, that's not a good hit by Dubinsky. I have to question his emotions getting the better of him in some of these most recent games.

5:00 for interference and a game misconduct though? Wow...
 

aRussian

Registered User
Oct 21, 2007
11,171
1,851
Ohio
I don't question a penalty, but I sure as hell question that call.
5 mins and misconduct? Looked like the collision was unavoidable. Crap call. Calls very uneven this game. Looking for some makeup calls in the 3rd
 

punk_o_holic

Registered User
Mar 1, 2002
10,169
819
N. Vancouver, B.C.
It did look a little late. But a major? Please.

I think it was a major, not because it was late but because of the hit to the head. Then, when you see a player injured, it makes it easier for the refs to give him a major.

ALso, watching from a Ducks feed. They said the refs didn't indicate a penalty at first so it was all on the linesmen(they said for stuff like this, they have a say).
 

MFRONE

Registered User
Feb 3, 2005
12,990
1,588
Columbus, Ohio
No call was even made on the ice. They didn't even call anything until well after the play was whistled down. What a ****ing joke.
 

Columbus Jack

He's from Columbus
Nov 25, 2009
10,853
1,838
PA
I really didnt think that was a hit to the head. If anything Beauchemins hit on Arty was more of a headshot. Saku Koivu needs to retire if hes that brittle
 

major major

Registered User
Feb 18, 2013
14,598
1,669
That's a dirty headshot. Though probably not intentional I wouldn't be surprised if there's a suspension for that.

Oh, and 5 minutes, yes Dubi did it and it was to the head, 5 is about right. Dumb hit.

edit: The linesman can call that if they want to. Not a BS call.
 

aRussian

Registered User
Oct 21, 2007
11,171
1,851
Ohio
I think it was a major, not because it was late but because of the hit to the head. Then, when you see a player injured, it makes it easier for the refs to give him a major.

The ice hit his head. Break out the saws and throw that chunk in the box!

That call was excessive...
 

blahblah

Registered User
Nov 24, 2005
21,327
972
Well that's a first for me. 5 minutes for interference? That's a "Well, we have a player that was injured, so we felt we had to throw Dubi out for some reason!?".

Not a great night for the officials. If you think that was a hit to the head, call it a hit to the head.
 

eljefe72

Registered User
Jul 28, 2007
2,948
82
Columbus, Ohio
That's a dirty headshot. Though probably not intentional I wouldn't be surprised if there's a suspension for that.

Oh, and 5 minutes, yes Dubi did it and it was to the head, 5 is about right. Dumb hit.

edit: The linesman can call that if they want to. Not a BS call.

If it was unintentional, then it wasn't dirty. By definition a dirty hit is intentional.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad