VAN-HAB
Vancouver Habitant
King has not been good. Galchenyuk, Ott and Martinsen would all be worthier of his spot.
200% correct
King has not been good. Galchenyuk, Ott and Martinsen would all be worthier of his spot.
Shaw has been good. King is an anchor.
As other said, it's Michel Villeneuve. He's referring to the holdiay they had to call them party animals. Nothing there.
It was tripping, diving and also a weak call.
Lundqvist let in nothing and his team is winning.
Price would have a chance to win if he had been as good as his opponent.
This series will be played in nets. If Lundqvist > Price forget it.
Well that's the game
Don't like that it's called but that's a penalty all day long
Lundqvist let in nothing and his team is winning.
Price would have a chance to win if he had been as good as his opponent.
This series will be played in nets. If Lundqvist > Price forget it.
I think King has has a pretty solid game. Not sure what you're watching.
Lundqvist let in nothing and his team is winning.
Price would have a chance to win if he had been as good as his opponent.
This series will be played in nets. If Lundqvist > Price forget it.
Danault is the new Desharnais with more defensive ability and less offensive ability.
Deny it all you want..
Lundqvist let in nothing and his team is winning.
Price would have a chance to win if he had been as good as his opponent.
This series will be played in nets. If Lundqvist > Price forget it.
Honestly, at this point I'd prefer Flynn and Mitchell over King and Ott/Martinsen. At least I know the former can score goals in the playoffs.