GDT: Game 1 ECQF: Rangers @ Canadiens | Part II

Status
Not open for further replies.

Genesis76

True Leader
May 3, 2013
3,878
1,301
As other said, it's Michel Villeneuve. He's referring to the holdiay they had to call them party animals. Nothing there.

Are you serious? Do you not remember Koivu? He had all kinds of injurys and always came back stronger.

Galchenyuk is young, the only thing that would prevent him from going back to norm is his life style. Putting him in the 4th line is purely to teach him a few lessons.

Btw Villeneuve is not known for making up storys like that one.
 

expy

Registered User
Nov 2, 2010
16,009
17,225
All those years that galchenyuk could've developed at centre wasted because of DD. Now we have Danault as #1 centre.


Smh
 

c3z4r

Registered User
Jul 4, 2011
6,278
3,377
in the world
Honestly, at this point I'd prefer Flynn and Mitchell over King and Ott/Martinsen. At least I know the former can score goals in the playoffs.
 

Apoplectic Habs Fan

Registered User
Aug 17, 2002
30,411
19,475
Lundqvist let in nothing and his team is winning.

Price would have a chance to win if he had been as good as his opponent.

This series will be played in nets. If Lundqvist > Price forget it.

You need to score to lead a game.

Pretty simple concept that goes well over your head
 

Treb

Global Flanderator
May 31, 2011
29,708
30,495
Montreal
Lundqvist let in nothing and his team is winning.

Price would have a chance to win if he had been as good as his opponent.

This series will be played in nets. If Lundqvist > Price forget it.

Price still kept his team in the game. He is thus giving them a chance to win.

Do you understand you are saying a 0.964 save percentage is not good enough? What does he need to do to be a good PO goalie to you? Go 16-0-0 with 16 shutouts?
 

Whitesnake

If you rebuild, they will come.
Jan 5, 2003
90,739
39,654
Danault is the new Desharnais with more defensive ability and less offensive ability.

Deny it all you want..

Here we go....we finally found the new scapegoat. But what do they both have in common?????
 

void

Registered User
Jan 5, 2006
27,459
1,685
Honestly, at this point I'd prefer Flynn and Mitchell over King and Ott/Martinsen. At least I know the former can score goals in the playoffs.

Ott has been good. Sitting him would be stupid.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad