How to fill it? Specifically remembering the situation with Nishushkin, Landeskog and Lehkonen.In way over his head. On Macfarland for not filling the holes up front. You can’t win in this league with a 1 good (albeit very good) top line and a 2C, and then a bunch of guys.
Rantanen 4 goals, MacK and Makar 3 points a piece next game?Top guys will improve
I thought it was Mittelstadt.I thought aside from Rantanen's 3 goals, Kovalenko was the best Avs forward last night
More on the defensive side than anything. They lacked there last night. Alongside that, I include Toews and Makar there as outside of the PP, that pairing lacked quite a bit.Rantanen 4 goals, MacK and Makar 3 points a piece next game?
In way over his head. On Macfarland for not filling the holes up front. You can’t win in this league with a 1 good (albeit very good) top line and a 2C, and then a bunch of guys.
Exactly. What are the options here?I mean, are you just conveniently ignoring that fact that one top six forward is recovering from shoulder surgery, another has missed the last two years because of a literal knee transplant, and the other is suspended for a year because of a nose candy issue?
I liked Mitts a lot too, Bednar was quick to praise him in his presser.I thought it was Mittelstadt.
I would list Makar in the "did bad" section. If you pay a guy nine million per season, you better get a player who can lift the puck out of your defensive zone on PK, when there's no-one around you. Not with any "I guess every now and then" or "I guess he tried to". Without excuses, every single time.I liked Mitts a lot too, Bednar was quick to praise him in his presser.
About the only guys I wasn't thrilled with (apart from the goddamn goalies) were MacKinnon on those two horrid, lazy defensive lapses that both led to goals against in the closing 90 seconds of the first, some bad decision making by Sammy at both ends of the ice (and come on, man, don't get shown up by THAT guy of all guys), Toews' inexcusably bad coverage on the odd-man rush, and both Colton and Wood. Neither of those guys were doing much in the way or winning puck battles or controlling the play. As usual, LOC was doing a LOT of the heavy lifting at both ends of the ice for that line.
Guys who stood out in good ways IMO were Rants (of course), Mitts, Manson, O'Connor, and Kiviranta. The rest were just kinda meh.
The two rookies didn't bother me that much and even though their underlying stats were bad, the bottom pairing had some good moments.
Eh, he whiffed badly but at the same time I hate that a mistake, even one that bad, led to a goal against. And even that was a terrible goal to give up.I would list Makar in the "did bad" section. If you pay a guy nine million per season, you better get a player who can lift the puck out of your defensive zone on PK, when there's no-one around you. Not with any "I guess every now and then" or "I guess he tried to". Without excuses, every single time.
Speaking of LOC, how did he look? A lot of questions with his deal because of his injury. Did he look like his old self? If he did, amazing.If we could just get two clones of LOC, we could save so much money on our 3rd line and also probably have the best 3rd line in the league lol.
That was the case for Makar most of the entire last season. Very lackluster aside from the PP and shifts where MacK really took over in the offensive zone.More on the defensive side than anything. They lacked there last night. Alongside that, I include Toews and Makar there as outside of the PP, that pairing lacked quite a bit.
Speaking of LOC, how did he look? A lot of questions with his deal because of his injury. Did he look like his old self? If he did, amazing.
Moot point. We have an unlikeable, useless gimp in net as it is, we're not replacing him with someone who is only occasionally better, just as inconsistent or at least as prone to mood swings,, is paid twice as much and has a track record of inciting race hate against Avalanche players.I also don't think I could stomach that...
I just think counting Landeskog at this point isn’t fair, he’s been out for two years now and who knows when or if he’ll actually return, and what can be expected of him when he does? At this point he should be treated as not coming back and a huge bonus if he does, I blame McFarland for not replacing him. You’re right on Nuke and Leky, can’t blame him for that. But he knew all off season they’d be out for at least a month. A lot of good players went to camps on PTO’s, and he brings in Bellemare… now relying on a 19 year old rookie who’s clearly not NHL ready to fill a top 6 role. But I’m probably being too hard on him.Yeah, I detest the guy but he will not actively cost the Avs games in ways Georgiev does.
Just hold up. That's all the Avs ask of their goaltenders. Do not give up awful goals, stop what you are supposed to and make the occasional big save. No need to steal games most nights - the Avs play will dictate that usually.
How is this on Macfarland? He is missing three top-six forwards.
Like I said in the other thread, take Hyman, RNH and Skinner away from Edmonton and all of a sudden you have Janmark and Perry on line 2.
He was handcuffed. It happens. We have to survive.
What’s wrong with it? He’s had two years to find a replacement for Landy. Do you truly think Landy is coming back at this point, despite 0 timetable? And if he does, can we expect much from him after being off so long? I agree his hands were tied with Nuke and Leky, but he also did have all off season knowing they wouldn’t be ready for at least a month. Like I said earlier, there were quite a few solid players attending camps on PTO’s, yet he brings in Bellemare.What a take…
Shots firedSo Makar has peaked then. Got it. Maybe it’s time for the tired old medical excuse when he’s sucked for awhile now
I blame him for not finding a replacement for Landy in the two seasons he’s been out. I don’t blame him for the other two as shit happens, but he’s also had all off season knowing they’d miss at least a month. Plenty of useful and NHL capable forwards attending campsI mean, are you just conveniently ignoring that fact that one top six forward is recovering from shoulder surgery, another has missed the last two years because of a literal knee transplant, and the other is suspended for a year because of a nose candy issue?
This discussion started last night, but I think it is perfectly plausible that Toews a few years ago had the capability to cover for a few of Makar's shortcomings to the point where we didn't know they existed. Now that Toews is starting to regress, those shortcomings are becoming evident. This could very easily be the case, and wouldn't be unheard of. It is probably early to exclaim that it is, but evidence is mounting. Another season of it would convince me.That was the case for Makar most of the entire last season. Very lackluster aside from the PP and shifts where MacK really took over in the offensive zone.
What are they supposed to do, trade him? No one is taking that contract.What’s wrong with it? He’s had two years to find a replacement for Landy. Do you truly think Landy is coming back at this point, despite 0 timetable? And if he does, can we expect much from him after being off so long? I agree his hands were tied with Nuke and Leky, but he also did have all off season knowing they wouldn’t be ready for at least a month. Like I said earlier, there were quite a few solid players attending camps on PTO’s, yet he brings in Bellemare.
Please list these players.I blame him for not finding a replacement for Landy in the two seasons he’s been out. I don’t blame him for the other two as shit happens, but he’s also had all off season knowing they’d miss at least a month. Plenty of useful and NHL capable forwards attending camps
On PTO’s.