Well there you go. The Hawks Goaltender scout is presumably high on this kid. Hopefully he works out.The real interest cannot be deceived. Adam immediately explained why he particularly emphasizes the "Black Hawks."
"Goaltending scouts have a much closer relationship with goaltenders than when a scout talks to a player. The Chicago goaltending scout communicates with me often; he has come to see me in person about ten times, and the head scout of the club has also seen me with his own eyes."
He clarified that genuine interest cannot be fooled.
"Many teams tell me that they have me highly rated and would like to draft me, but with some of them, you feel they have a significant interest. They engage in more detailed conversations with me. With Chicago, my agent and I have a very good feeling," says our goaltending comet.
I wonder if they had strong indication he would not be available if they passed on him at 35.first goalie drafted too. surprising.
Because you can get plenty of talented ones in UDFA or later rounds like 5th or 6th. And goalies are harder to project
Seems to be having fantastic season
Some questioned drafting goalie at #35 but thus far he is showing to be legit prospect worthy of selection in that spot
Did you watch him play in the USHL? or just based on stats?Stagnating a bit this year in the USHL in his 19 year old season. Augustine and Fowler were way higher on my board, taking him that high was strange to me.
That's the problem: his World Junior performances are the only standout stretches he's had since coming to North America. 0.917 in the NAHL in his 18 year old season is good, nothing special. 0.902 in the USHL in his 19 year old season is not great at all.Did you watch him play in the USHL? or just based on stats?
I thought he was great at the WJC, but I'm not watching the USHL outside of upcoming draft prospects.
Unless you have access to other advanced stats or have watched him play games it's really hard to draw conclusions from save percentage and other basic stats.That's the problem: his World Junior performances are the only standout stretches he's had since coming to North America. 0.917 in the NAHL in his 18 year old season is good, nothing special. 0.902 in the USHL in his 19 year old season is not great at all.
The only 18 year old season NAHL goalies that became anything special are Bishop (late birthday) and Hellebuyck, and both of them went straight to the NCAA for their 19 year old season. I could obviously be wrong, but Gajan's statistical stagnation as an older junior player is not positive.
That's quite a bit higher than league wide save % fwiw, 5th in league amongst qualified games played, and it's hard to gauge just from stats. Will be interested to see how he progresses at NCAA next season.That's the problem: his World Junior performances are the only standout stretches he's had since coming to North America. 0.917 in the NAHL in his 18 year old season is good, nothing special. 0.902 in the USHL in his 19 year old season is not great at all.
The only 18 year old season NAHL goalies that became anything special are Bishop (late birthday) and Hellebuyck, and both of them went straight to the NCAA for their 19 year old season. I could obviously be wrong, but Gajan's statistical stagnation as an older junior player is not positive.
The point is, he's not dominant at a lowel level as an older player, whereas Augustine and Fowler have looked good to very good at a higher level.That's quite a bit higher than league wide save % fwiw, 5th in league amongst qualified games played, and it's hard to gauge just from stats. Will be interested to see how he progresses at NCAA next season.
Well yes, it was known on draft day that Augustine and Fowler were further ahead, so they gambled on development given long goaltender curves. We'll see how it plays out.The point is, he's not dominant at a lowel level as an older player, whereas Augustine and Fowler have looked good to very good at a higher level.
It's just a riskier gamble when better skaters and better goalies were on the board at the time. And yes, we will see how it plays out.Well yes, it was known on draft day that Augustine and Fowler were further ahead, so they gambled on development given long goaltender curves. We'll see how it plays out.
That was technically Helley’s age 19 season when he played for Odessa.That's the problem: his World Junior performances are the only standout stretches he's had since coming to North America. 0.917 in the NAHL in his 18 year old season is good, nothing special. 0.902 in the USHL in his 19 year old season is not great at all.
The only 18 year old season NAHL goalies that became anything special are Bishop (late birthday) and Hellebuyck, and both of them went straight to the NCAA for their 19 year old season. I could obviously be wrong, but Gajan's statistical stagnation as an older junior player is not positive.
No it wasn't. 1993 born, season starts in 2011, thus 18 year old season.That was technically Helley’s age 19 season when he played for Odessa.
For a guy who was playing in the Slovak Juniors system a couple years ago, I think Gajan has come a long way, still has a ways to go of course but he's got time to get where he needs to be.No it wasn't. 1993 born, season starts in 2011, thus 18 year old season.