Speculation: - Future Roster/Trade Discussion | Page 23 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League
Toggle sidebar

Speculation: Future Roster/Trade Discussion

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.
FloridaPanthersFan84 said:
After watching Justus Annunen in IIHF worlds i would've started think how much Nashville wants for him.
We need a goalie and Annunen is younger than Bob which is absolutely positive detail.
Yes Annunen is not tested in NHL playoffs so that's a question.
But how about bringing Annunen Bob's or Tarasov's back up.

Predators would still have Saros in their starter goalie.
And if they trade Annunen to Panthers they can give Annunen's
games minutes for Jack Ivankovic who's Predators future starter after Saros.

So the question is this.
Should Zito target Justus Annunen and sacrifice our 9th overall pick and 2029 1st round pick.

Or should've give predators only our this years 9th pick,
one expiring contract ( Jesper Boqvist or E-Rod ) and prospect ( not Vilmanis ) what you think?
Click to expand...
from the fins i was reading Annunen is very hot/cold, and also that is insane steal for nashville
 
  • Like
Reactions: RogerRoger
FloridaPanthersFan84 said:
After watching Justus Annunen in IIHF worlds i would've started think how much Nashville wants for him.
We need a goalie and Annunen is younger than Bob which is absolutely positive detail.
Yes Annunen is not tested in NHL playoffs so that's a question.
But how about bringing Annunen Bob's or Tarasov's back up.

Predators would still have Saros in their starter goalie.
And if they trade Annunen to Panthers they can give Annunen's
games minutes for Jack Ivankovic who's Predators future starter after Saros.

So the question is this.
Should Zito target Justus Annunen and sacrifice our 9th overall pick and 2029 1st round pick.

Or should've give predators only our this years 9th pick,
one expiring contract ( Jesper Boqvist or E-Rod ) and prospect ( not Vilmanis ) what you think?
Click to expand...
He had like 5 good games to end the season no doubt and a strong tournament but he is 26, has bad overall numbers, and was just acquired for a 6th round pick a year ago. Why would Florida move 2 firsts lol. If Zito wasn't a Tarasov fan I'd see no harm in moving say a 3rd to have him play 30 games.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RCGP2
ucanthanzalthetruth said:
He had like 5 good games to end the season no doubt and a strong tournament but he is 26, has bad overall numbers, and was just acquired for a 6th round pick a year ago. Why would Florida move 2 firsts lol. If Zito wasn't a Tarasov fan I'd see no harm in moving say a 3rd to have him play 30 games.
Click to expand...
Brodie sets wild values.
 
FloridaPanthersFan84 said:
After watching Justus Annunen in IIHF worlds i would've started think how much Nashville wants for him.
We need a goalie and Annunen is younger than Bob which is absolutely positive detail.
Yes Annunen is not tested in NHL playoffs so that's a question.
But how about bringing Annunen Bob's or Tarasov's back up.

Predators would still have Saros in their starter goalie.
And if they trade Annunen to Panthers they can give Annunen's
games minutes for Jack Ivankovic who's Predators future starter after Saros.

So the question is this.
Should Zito target Justus Annunen and sacrifice our 9th overall pick and 2029 1st round pick.

Or should've give predators only our this years 9th pick,
one expiring contract ( Jesper Boqvist or E-Rod ) and prospect ( not Vilmanis ) what you think?
Click to expand...
IMG_2597.gif
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: Vilam, MaWa, pantherbot and 3 others
FloridaPanthersFan84 said:
After watching Justus Annunen in IIHF worlds i would've started think how much Nashville wants for him.
We need a goalie and Annunen is younger than Bob which is absolutely positive detail.
Yes Annunen is not tested in NHL playoffs so that's a question.
But how about bringing Annunen Bob's or Tarasov's back up.

Predators would still have Saros in their starter goalie.
And if they trade Annunen to Panthers they can give Annunen's
games minutes for Jack Ivankovic who's Predators future starter after Saros.

So the question is this.
Should Zito target Justus Annunen and sacrifice our 9th overall pick and 2029 1st round pick.

Or should've give predators only our this years 9th pick,
one expiring contract ( Jesper Boqvist or E-Rod ) and prospect ( not Vilmanis ) what you think?
Click to expand...
This can't be serious. Annunen isn't worth anything close to that, a mid round pick at best.

Ivankovic isn't NHL ready either, he's 19, he needs a few AHL years still.
 
You guys would pass on Gibson?

I mean definitely not my first choice. But he's been on shit teams for several years, I don't think his stats are the best representation of his ability.

Granted, the last time he had good stats with a full starter workload was when he was 25.

Entirely possible he has declined in ability but you can really only know that by watching him over the years. Stat watching with goalies is probably the least reliable thing you can do, especially if they play on garbage teams.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BabyBennettov
Felidae said:
You guys would pass on Gibson?

I mean definitely not my first choice. But he's been on shit teams for several years, I don't think his stats are the best representation of his ability.

Granted, the last time he had good stats with a full starter workload was when he was 25.

Entirely possible he has declined in ability but you can really only know that by watching him over the years. Stat watching with goalies is probably the least reliable thing you can do, especially if they play on garbage teams.
Click to expand...
who knows on our team but i felt he was very good a few years ago and has been riding that since

Guess it depends on cost
 
Felidae said:
You guys would pass on Gibson?

I mean definitely not my first choice. But he's been on shit teams for several years, I don't think his stats are the best representation of his ability.

Granted, the last time he had good stats with a full starter workload was when he was 25.

Entirely possible he has declined in ability but you can really only know that by watching him over the years. Stat watching with goalies is probably the least reliable thing you can do, especially if they play on garbage teams.
Click to expand...
Gibson is good and only has one year left. Assuming the price makes sense it's an easy yes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RogerRoger and MaWa
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 14 (members: 6, guests: 8)

Latest posts

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom