I'm quite skeptical that any defenseman that might be had for a 15th+ is going to be a 15th+ better than anything available in UFA, or even that much better than some of the guys that might be available in cap motivated soft deals
He's spent roughly half of the past 3 years in the minors being sent down by each of the 3 teams he's played for over that period.Or, more likely.....everything non-Leaf is waaaay better than what the Leafs have.
For some of the rumour trades we would need to do to acquire him like 15th + or nylander for Manson +. I personally think is a little steep.
Does anyone know if Manson still deserves the praise he gets here or will we be paying for a 17/18 season he might never repeat?
Really tough to see them gambling on Campbell, so it is a really weird angleSurprised that Andersen's on that list of players being shopped, especially if it's a low cost asset. Cap clearing move indeed but if begs question who they have in mind to step into the starting role.
Surprised that Andersen's on that list of players being shopped, especially if it's a low cost asset. Cap clearing move indeed but if begs question who they have in mind to step into the starting role.
What today's move and these comments coming out say to me is looking to rework things prior to free agency ... Lends you to believe they'll be making a splash in October
I'm quite skeptical that any defenseman that might be had for a 15th+ is going to be a 15th+ better than anything available in UFA, or even that much better than some of the guys that might be available in cap motivated soft deals
My feeling is they probably have a guy in mind who they think will cost less than 4 mil aav as a replacement to use in a tandem with Campbell and then use the extra cap room to put towards a D man.
But lots of question marks here
IMO it actually cemented the fact that they won't be going anywhere. What does RW look like if one of those 2 are dealt after dealing Kapanen? It's not pretty.I mean I don't expect Dubas to come out and say Marner/Nylander are on the market but there's a realistic chance he hitches his wagon to that core again next year and moves around the rest of the roster to boost the blue line.
Still have no idea how that would work cap-wise.
But the Leafs have gotten a couple of needed futures today. So moving one of those two for a quality d-man is more up my alley than it was yesterday.
IMO it actually cemented the fact that they won't be going anywhere. What does RW look like if one of those 2 are dealt after dealing Kapanen? It's not pretty.
My feeling is they probably have a guy in mind who they think will cost less than 4 mil aav as a replacement to use in a tandem with Campbell and then use the extra cap room to put towards a D man.
But lots of question marks here
I posted this in the Kapanen trade thread but it's probably better suited for here.
There's been a lot of talk today of teams not giving qualifying offers to some players in fear that they will get more in arbitration than the teams can afford with a flat cap. Anyone know any players that may fall into this category?
I posted this in the Kapanen trade thread but it's probably better suited for here.
There's been a lot of talk today of teams not giving qualifying offers to some players in fear that they will get more in arbitration than the teams can afford with a flat cap. Anyone know any players that may fall into this category?
I have a strong suspicion they are going after Crawford or Holtby on a 2 year low AAV deal that they can tandem with Campbell then expose to Seattle.
I'm quite skeptical that any defenseman that might be had for a 15th+ is going to be a 15th+ better than anything available in UFA, or even that much better than some of the guys that might be available in cap motivated soft deals
What about Simmons and Perry on the Leafs. It doesn't get more asshole than that!
Mikheyev Tavares Nylander
Hyman Matthews Marner
Korshkov Kerfoot Simmonds
Clifford Engvall Perry
Robertson
I'm still thinking Brodie is the target on a Muzzin-like deal, which is fair.
Still not sure what they'd do for the bottom 6 though.