GDT: Free Agent Frenzy

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
  • We are currently aware of "log in/security error" issues that are affecting some users. We apologize and ask for your patience as we try to get these issues fixed.
Status
Not open for further replies.
teams are technically not 'allowed' to discuss years or dollars until noon...so brooks etc reached out to the rangers to ask if the reported 4/6.9 deal was true and rangers said 'of course not that would be against the rules' lol
 
MSL and Richards have been sources for many of the signings/trades that the Rangers have made. I would think that Weekes has contacts with them. Brooks and Crappy are likely to have the team as their source. They are not ready to confirm.
 
I want this to happen just so we can **** all over Brooks and Carp.

Would love for it to look like Rangers are against the media
 
4 years would make sense. Lundqvist and Staal both have 4 years left on their deals. Smith signed for 4 years. The Rangers throw all of their chips on the table and hope they can win one before Hank rides off into the sunset.

Not a fan of the likely reasoning, but I can see the logic in it.
 
MSL and Richards have been sources for many of the signings/trades that the Rangers have made. I would think that Weekes has contacts with them. Brooks and Crappy are likely to have the team as their source. They are not ready to confirm.

Crappy lol
 
Holy ****. I didn't want Shattenkirk because I was scared of term. If it's 4 years, I'm happy with that.

This. I figured he'd go for the money/term and no way we would offer 6 or 7 years.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad