OttawaSenators11
#25 FTW
- Oct 10, 2010
- 6,524
- 1,967
Don’t want McTavish at all not even for 25 and Hensler
Need someone better IMO.
Need someone better IMO.
We usually do worse.He was basically PPG this year for the last ~40 games. We could do worse.

Dorofeyev (offer sheet) or Peterka (trade) would be my ideal targets at this point.
Whitecloud or Karlsson would be my D targets depending on how the winger situation plays out, and what expendable assets we have remaining.
I asked the Flyers board for clarification. Will update once I get an answer.
I think you are under-valuing the 2029 1st Florida pick. Mid-round looks more likely to me; not sure if it is a lottery pick or not.Just looking at the remaining picks from the Tkachuk trade;
25 OA
2029 1st (lets value it as though it's 26 OA)
2027 2nd rd pick, (lets put it at at 45, mid round)
what kind of value does that hold? Basically a top 10 pick.
View attachment 1258479
Now, because some of the picks are future years, their value is a bit more difficult to judge, this years picks might be less valuable than next years if the draft class is better, but teams value getting it now rather than in two years. But the point remains, that's a lot of remaining value. It's not nothing. It's actually pretty similar value to what it took to get Eklund
EDIT: Decided some might think I'm being too generous with where I put the picks, so here's the absolute worst case with the assumption that Florida wins the presidents trophy in 2027 and the Stanley cup in 2029 giving us 25oa, 32oa (2029) and 64oa (2027)
View attachment 1258498
Drops the value of our remaining Tkachuk return (not including the two prospects from SJ) as 13oa.
We also have whoever we pick at 32 that we could flip before the start of the season, our 1st in 2027, our 2nd in 2027 ect.
Nuts to that. This has been awesome! I got a taste, and now I'm hooked!
There's no telling that far in the future, I'm trying to be somewhat conservative in my estimates, but there's also the somewhat hard to pin down value of having a pick now vs in 3 years (or 4 if the clause kicks in and it's deferred).I think you are under-valuing the 2029 1st Florida pick. Mid-round looks more likely to me; not sure if it is a lottery pick or not.
I know right? It's awesome. Way more interesting and fun than this offseason was looking likelol, feels like I've spent more time reading the HF boards over the last 3 days than I have over the last 3 months.
What a freaking week....and we're only halfway through it, with the draft still a few days away!
lol, feels like I've spent more time reading the HF boards over the last 3 days than I have over the last 3 months.
What a freaking week....and we're only halfway through it, with the draft still a few days away!
NPV valuations do not work!There's no telling that far in the future, I'm trying to be somewhat conservative in my estimates, but there's also the somewhat hard to pin down value of having a pick now vs in 3 years (or 4 if the clause kicks in and it's deferred).

There is Hodgson. MacDermid is just about cooked.The team is going to have to add some meat to the roster. Not a thug, but a player that can handle things. Up front or on the blue line. You guys have suggested Cozens on the wing and Pinto as 2C. If the team did this it would open up the options a bit. C, R/LW or RD.
lol, feels like I've spent more time reading the HF boards over the last 3 days than I have over the last 3 months.
What a freaking week....and we're only halfway through it, with the draft still a few days away!
JJ is following a similar path to Mctavish and that's why he is in the rumour millAll the stuff about Peterka is just musing and "hmmmm he played well with Stutzle".
There's no real smoke there and I wouldn't expect it to happen.
Cant find the link now but one of the insiders said we are pushing to get Whitecloud from Calgary.
Cant find the link now but one of the insiders said we are pushing to get Whitecloud from Calgary.