Proposal: - Free agency edition Trade Rumours/Proposals - 2025/26 Part II | Page 392 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Proposal: Free agency edition Trade Rumours/Proposals - 2025/26 Part II

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.
  • Due to the increased volume of league transactions, the Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk section is temporarily restricted to where threads may only be started by moderators and sponsors. We anticipate that this restriction will be lifted some time after the first round of the draft.
It also doesn’t sound like Columbus is keen on moving Marchenko according to Lebrun. No reason to have these pipe dreams.
I’m sure they’re not keen. But that doesn’t mean they won’t have to if he won’t extend. His name is being floated a lot, Friedman even said they might be in a position where they have to consider it.
 
I’m sure they’re not keen. But that doesn’t mean they won’t have to if he won’t extend. His name is being floated too much for there not to be something to it, Friedman even said they might be in a position where they have to consider it.
That’s possible, according to Lebrun Montreal checked in on him and CBJ told them no.
 
I think Cozens might be perceived as more valuable outside Ottawa. If you're looking for a 2nd line C and anyone heard both Cozens and Grieg were available, you'd get more interest in Cozens. Maybe not though. But that's why I'm keeping Grieg, he's half the price and just as valuable in the big picture
Cozens and Greig are not in the same conversation in terms of value whether outside of Ottawa or in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gil Gunderson

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad