SingnBluesOnBroadway
Retired
Obviously Panarin is at the top of that list.How would you guys rank these guys:
Nash in 2012
Gaborik in 2010
Panarin in 2019?
Obviously Panarin is at the top of that list.How would you guys rank these guys:
Nash in 2012
Gaborik in 2010
Panarin in 2019?
$12M is McDavid money (or close to it)....Unless we're actually getting McDavid -- No thanks.Uncle Larry: Sounds like $12m per is magic # for Panarin. Trouba is going to come in at close to $8m. NYR have about $18.4 of space and don’t have Buchnevich, Lemieux, DeAngelo signed yet. Cap space presumes Smith in AHL.
How would you guys rank these guys:
Nash in 2012
Gaborik in 2010
Panarin in 2019?
How would you guys rank these guys:
Nash in 2012
Gaborik in 2010
Panarin in 2019?
How would you guys rank these guys:
Nash in 2012
Gaborik in 2010
Panarin in 2019?
I disagree. Paying Panarin $12 million+ would just be old time Rangers bull****. Sticking to our price and not budging is most definitely not a Rangers thing. It is refreshing.
It gave other teams leverage to offer more, knowing the Rangers limits.There was no leverage.
Do they? 27 forwards scored 80+ points this year. Seguin, Kessel, Wheeler, Panarin were the only ones who have ever been traded. Wheeler was not what he is now when he was traded, Kessel has defensive issues and has had issues with managements which leads you just Seguin (before he was established), and Panarin.
$12M is McDavid money (or close to it)....Unless we're actually getting McDavid -- No thanks.
10,000 spoons when all you need is a knife.
The teams knew anyway. Panarin's agent is going to tell them. If the Rangers offer was the top at the time, he would use that as leverage to gain a higher offer. Brooks writing about it has ZERO impact. ZERO.It gave other teams leverage to offer more, knowing the Rangers limits.
Do they? 27 forwards scored 80+ points this year. Seguin, Kessel, Wheeler, Panarin were the only ones who have ever been traded. Wheeler was not what he is now when he was traded, Kessel has defensive issues and has had issues with managements which leads you just Seguin (before he was established), and Panarin.
being okay with 10.5 but not 12 just makes no sense to me. it’s an elite player. unless you really don’t want him in the first place (which is fine) that 1.5 mill is meaningless.
Seems as though the NYR and Panarin are playing a game of chicken right now. The Rangers holding off offering more money and Panarin holding off committing to the NYI.
Panarin's a more complete player. Nash and Gaborik were more pure snipers.
Well, when you look at a micro-sample like that, sure it might fit your argument. I was more so referring to elite players. Kessel was literally just traded...again. EK. Stone. Hall. This will be Panarin's third team in four years.
The Rangers were being the Rangers for most of the last 15 years. Besides riding Lundqvist, they never drafted very high, several first round busts, no cups, several bad buried signings?
If the barometer for anything good/bad the Rangers do for the rest of the 21st century is what happened from y2k to the 05 lockout, then yeah...they were way less stupid, but..
This is the first year they ever really tried to build.
Plus, I heard he has a model girlfriend that works in NYC so is she willing to commute to Manhattan for her work? I don't think so.This is the likely scenario.
Nash was one of the best two way wingers we’ve ever had.
But they also home-grew a lot of players during that time also.
I'm all for signing Panarin, but can you imagine how annoyed Zbad will be, if he ends up outscoring the Breadman when he's making half his salary?
bc that is 3million over your preferred offer and not 1.5 million.you have to draw the line somewhere...10.5 - 12 is just a meaningless 1.5 mil...then why not go to 13.5 mil since 12-13.5 is just another meaningless 1.5 mil?