Cousin Eddie
You Serious Clark?
- Nov 3, 2006
- 40,189
- 37,429
Glencross will absolutely be my whipping boy if he makes the wan and plays with Duchene.
Glencross will absolutely be my whipping boy if he makes the wan and plays with Duchene.
A little bit. His past production is used as his baseline rather than his peak production. I tend to think Barry Trotz and Mike Babcock are excellent coaches and there's a reason Glencross gets cut after these teams express very clear interest in acquiring him.
Pretty much seems to be people want whoever we don't have, like a month ago when everyone was dying to have glencross here on a PTO and now want nothing to do with him.
Pretty much seems to be people want whoever we don't have, like a month ago when everyone was dying to have glencross here on a PTO and now want nothing to do with him.
I don't think the trade happened that way
Even if he doesn't make it, He should be the whipping boy. Mid March, if we lose any games, I'm blaming him.
pet peeve here...
Why are people writing Curtis Glencross's initials as GC? He's not Glen Cross. It should be CG. /rant
Thanks BB!
Everyone? And like Avs_19 said those that wanted him wanted him far away from Matt.
I get everyone jumping to the GlenX idea, but there is a benefit to trimming a contract. Some interesting names could still hit waivers or become available
I'll be honest though, my first thought was Bickell (retained) so GlenX is probably not the worst thing out there
I get everyone jumping to the GlenX idea, but there is a benefit to trimming a contract. Some interesting names could still hit waivers or become available
I'll be honest though, my first thought was Bickell (retained) so GlenX is probably not the worst thing out there
Hamilton looked fine in camp but he signed at the last minute, there must have been some resistance there.
If anything it should be GX.pet peeve here...
Why are people writing Curtis Glencross's initials as GC? He's not Glen Cross. It should be CG. /rant