Toggle sidebar

Podcast (Audio) Former NHL Refeere Tim Peel Discusses the Rangers overturned goal

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Khall9

Khall9

Registered User
Apr 28, 2021
75
103
Former 20+ year NHL Referee Tim Peel explains the ruling on Chytil's disallowed goal and what the officials and Toronto saw on the play. He also talks about the call on Lindgren and the bad call on Trouba to put the Rangers in a 5-on-3 situation.
Click to read more...
 
I don’t have a problem with the call on trouba if it were at ES (though the Pens got away with plenty of shit at ES that could have been whistled. Matheson in particular is guilty of obstruction on almost every shift.)

What I have a problem with is that it was called while the pens already had a PP. it almost always takes something completely overboard, especially in the playoffs to generate a 5 on 3 unless we’re talking delay of game. Strome was egregiously hooked on the Rangers lone PP (by carter, I think) and it went uncalled. It was basically a life line thrown to Pitt in response to the Rangers scoring SH.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Go Rangers, BroadwayBlues, TheDirtyH and 9 others
GENESISPuck94 said:
This is the piece of garbage that was fixing games and got caught.

All these refs fix games, they just haven't been caught yet.
Click to expand...
Ive said a million times already. The betting apps have made the reffing substantially worse. I dunno if its bc they want more scoring or wanting certain teams to win ? But the introduction of these apps have not been good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Number 9, CasusBelli, RickChartraw and 1 other person
Cmox said:
Ive said a million times already. The betting apps have made the reffing substantially worse. I dunno if its bc they want more scoring or wanting certain teams to win ? But the introduction of these apps have not been good.
Click to expand...
The correlation is astounding and so obvious. I don't understand how this hasn't caught on to more people.

Gambling is bad. It's worse when the leagues allow it, it completely undermines the legitimacy of the games.

After last night's game, if I were an NHL exec I would be rallying for a serious investigation into these refs and the league. Obviously they won't make the bets themselves but their friends and family can.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nsvoyageurs and Cmox
Cmox said:
Ive said a million times already. The betting apps have made the reffing substantially worse. I dunno if its bc they want more scoring or wanting certain teams to win ? But the introduction of these apps have not been good.
Click to expand...

In theory, the presence of gambling should drive the NHL to improve officiating.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nsvoyageurs and Baby Punisher
Calvin Ridley got suspended for at least the 2022 season for using an app to place parlay bets on NFL games. Not the Falcons. Does anyone really think Ridley is the one individual who bet on parlays or prop bets. Seriously?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cmox and GENESISPuck94
If we are going to say the refs (who do make mistakes) fixed the game for the games we lose then we will have to hold the same standard when other teams say the refs fixed the game so a NY team can win.
 
does anyone think this was retribution for the Dolan letter after the Tom Wilson shit last season? i had a bad feeling they would wait to screw us at an opportune moment like this ever since that day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Go Rangers
TominNC said:
I think fans confuse incompetence with a thought out plan.

Look at MLB umps. The strike zone is a rumor.

Officiating stinks. They are people who are effected by score and situation. It’s not a conspiracy.
Click to expand...
COuldn't agree more and I have had this discussion with fans of teams I support when they get worked up over calls not going our way. Incompetence is by FAR the largest driver of poor calls, not conspiracies against a particular team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Barnaby, Holocene and Wtp99
Mathews28 said:
COuldn't agree more and I have had this discussion with fans of teams I support when they get worked up over calls not going our way. Incompetence is by FAR the largest driver of poor calls, not conspiracies against a particular team.
Click to expand...
I am not a ref, nor a fan of any of them, but incompetence might be going a bit too far.

Yes it's their job to get it right... but it's certainly a tough job, happens at full speed in real time and a thankless job regardless of their call.

We have all watched enough slow-mo, HD and now SUPER SLOW 4K replays to yell and scream at that "Awful call!!!"

Sometimes, in real time... they just miss them or get them wrong. Sometimes it might be incompetence. Sometimes a grudge or make up call. Either way, it's just the human factor.

Until we have robots doing it no one will be 100% happy about the officiating... and even then I guarantee there will be issues.

That being said, it always seems to happen FOR THE PENS :laugh:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Larrybiv, Unpredictable1 and AirGut
NickyFotiu said:
If we are going to say the refs (who do make mistakes) fixed the game for the games we lose then we will have to hold the same standard when other teams say the refs fixed the game so a NY team can win.
Click to expand...
I have no doubt we were benefactors in some fixed calls.

Is it incompetence and "just missing calls" when you don't call routine icing like 3 to 4 times in a row in one period, all for the same team?
 
Uninstaaled said:
I don’t have a problem with the call on trouba if it were at ES (though the Pens got away with plenty of shit at ES that could have been whistled. Matheson in particular is guilty of obstruction on almost every shift.)

What I have a problem with is that it was called while the pens already had a PP. it almost always takes something completely overboard, especially in the playoffs to generate a 5 on 3 unless we’re talking delay of game. Strome was egregiously hooked on the Rangers lone PP (by carter, I think) and it went uncalled. It was basically a life line thrown to Pitt in response to the Rangers scoring SH.
Click to expand...
Exactly. That call being made while Pittsburgh was already on the PP in a playoff game was completely absurd to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Unpredictable1 and deathb4disco
I can see the Sports Betting agencies making a stink about 'Game Management'.

Refs trying to keep a game close could f*** with over/unders. While its not 'fixing' games, you cant let officials try to steer games into desired outcomes ("even" 4-2 games, prevent 6-1's with unbalanced penalties) because thats not something that can be factored into betting odds.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ujju2
Riche16 said:
I am not a ref, nor a fan of any of them, but incompetence might be going a bit too far.

Yes it's their job to get it right... but it's certainly a tough job, happens at full speed in real time and a thankless job regardless of their call.

We have all watched enough slow-mo, HD and now SUPER SLOW 4K replays to yell and scream at that "Awful call!!!"

Sometimes, in real time... they just miss them or get them wrong. Sometimes it might be incompetence. Sometimes a grudge or make up call. Either way, it's just the human factor.

Until we have robots doing it no one will be 100% happy about the officiating... and even then I guarantee there will be issues.

That being said, it always seems to happen FOR THE PENS :laugh:
Click to expand...
If not incompetence it’s SOMETHING when they decide not to call anything.
 
ElLeetch said:
I can see the Sports Betting agencies making a stink about 'Game Management'.

Refs trying to keep a game close could f*** with over/unders. While its not 'fixing' games, you cant let officials try to steer games into desired outcomes ("even" 4-2 games, prevent 6-1's with unbalanced penalties) because thats not something that can be factored into betting odds.
Click to expand...

It certainly can be factored in. You just need to look at historical trends.
 
Does the OP post anything other than ads for his podcast to drive traffic? Contribute much?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chytilmania
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom