Former Canucks Thread 2023-24 Off-Season Edition

HairyKneel

Registered User
Jun 5, 2023
1,520
1,407


McSorely hasn't changed since 1998. Still a f***ing moron that blames Brashear for what happened.


Brashear was a scumbag too. He beat the shit out of a guy in a bar fight in Yaletown years ago and then strangled a security guard in his apartment complex. He used to dust his hands after a fight and taunt the other team and players. Marty is a meathead. So is Donald.

Give me Gino, Delorme, Fraser or Hunter.


Marty is punch drunk though. I mean, he won a lot more than he lost, but he sounds so brain dead.
 

Mr. Canucklehead

Kitimat Canuck
Dec 14, 2002
42,548
38,051
Kitimat, BC
Marty is punch drunk though. I mean, he won a lot more than he lost, but he sounds so brain dead.

I don’t know if we listened to the same interview. Marty sounds coherent, his recall is strong, and he’s clearly relived this incident a great many times. Doesn’t sound impaired in any way or fashion from where I sit.

Also, I don’t think he comes off as blaming Brashear, so much as he still feels this was all an accident that happened in the scope of players doing their jobs. He said Vancouver scored an empty net goal, that Crawford threw Brashear onto the ice with 22 seconds left, turned to the Bruins bench and smiled / smirked, and Burns immediately instructed McSorley to get out there. McSorley felt/knew his job in that moment was to get Brashear to fight, and that he wasn’t aiming for his head - he said if you watch the video, Brashear turns to the right, his right shoulder drops, and McSorley’s stick initially strikes Brashear’s shoulder, rides up and hits him in the head.

He also said he felt for Bertuzzi for what happened to him - he felt in that moment Bertuzzi was doing his job, that he was likely instructed to do his job, and that he never intended for what happened to Moore to actually happen. But that he felt, like his situation, they were two guys instructed to go and do their jobs and it had unexpected ramifications - and when those ramifications came down on them, McSorley at least felt like he was left out in the cold by his team and the league.

Brashear was an absolute cancer that I hated almost as much as Mark Messier. Addition by subtraction when he finally left.

I don’t know how much of Brashear’s attitude was really public knowledge until after he was traded. He was certainly cocky and disrespectful as a fighter, but his attitude on the team and in the room was certainly a problem as well. The Canucks got off to a lousy start that season, and when Brashear was dispatched for Hlavac, a big turnaround began almost immediately.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vector

Breakers

Make Mirrored Visors Legal Again
Aug 5, 2014
22,880
21,557
Denver Colorado
It's still too early to tell for sure, but I think the Canucks absolutely had to sell high on him because it seemed likely that his value would fall off a cliff this year.

Yeah for sure too early
But he should be upwards of 3x as many points. Apparently he is on the PP
 

Vector

Moderator
Feb 2, 2007
27,794
47,289
Junktown
I don’t know if we listened to the same interview. Marty sounds coherent, his recall is strong, and he’s clearly relived this incident a great many times. Doesn’t sound impaired in any way or fashion from where I sit.

Also, I don’t think he comes off as blaming Brashear, so much as he still feels this was all an accident that happened in the scope of players doing their jobs. He said Vancouver scored an empty net goal, that Crawford threw Brashear onto the ice with 22 seconds left, turned to the Bruins bench and smiled / smirked, and Burns immediately instructed McSorley to get out there. McSorley felt/knew his job in that moment was to get Brashear to fight, and that he wasn’t aiming for his head - he said if you watch the video, Brashear turns to the right, his right shoulder drops, and McSorley’s stick initially strikes Brashear’s shoulder, rides up and hits him in the head.

I listened to this part of the interview and watched the video of what happened as he was describing it. He tries to downplay what happened to Brashear by saying the stick hit him in the cheek (and blames the league for a lot of the backlash). Which isn’t true. It smacked Brashear on the side of the head. He’s willfully twisting the specifics to make it seem like a softer incident. He also said Brashear made a hard turn to the right which is an exaggeration. Brashest slightly skates to the right while still going in a straight line and McSorely slashes him in the head from behind. It has enough force to knock the guy out.

 

Mr. Canucklehead

Kitimat Canuck
Dec 14, 2002
42,548
38,051
Kitimat, BC
I listened to this part of the interview and watched the video of what happened as he was describing it. He tries to downplay what happened to Brashear by saying the stick hit him in the cheek (and blames the league for a lot of the backlash). Which isn’t true. It smacked Brashear on the side of the head. He’s willfully twisting the specifics to make it seem like a softer incident. He also said Brashear made a hard turn to the right which is an exaggeration. Brashest slightly skates to the right while still going in a straight line and McSorely slashes him in the head from behind. It has enough force to knock the guy out.



Oh, I’m not saying his version of events is gospel/accurate, just how he saw it. And I agree, there was no hard right turn, maybe kind of a lazy glide right. His shoulder did drop, so maybe McSorley was aiming for that, but he hit him square in the head with force. And in my opinion, based on the way McSorley went down, that knocked him senseless. Banging his head on the ice for good measure didn’t help.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vector

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad