GKJ
Global Moderator
- Feb 27, 2002
- 194,827
- 44,556
(EDIT)
Last edited by a moderator:
If that happens the Flyers actually have a shot of “winning “ a trade when their backs were somewhat to the wall.If he ever gets to be as good overall as Konecny I’ll be surprised. To paraphrase Lloyd Bentsen, “I’ve seen centers and, Quitter, you’re no NHL center.”
Weird hypothetical as this is Drysdale’s D+4 and we have more information than we did when he was drafted at 18.If both were available in the same draft and the Flyers pick was 5th overall, who would you pick, Gauthier or Drysdale? Wait...if you pick Drysdale, the NHL will throw in a future 2nd rounder. Now who would you pick?
Weird hypothetical as this is Drysdale’s D+4 and we have more information than we did when he was drafted at 18.
The Flyers don’t even entertain this trade if Gauthier is willing to sign.
The Flyers would want a bigger sweetener than a 2nd rd pick, but they also probably had discounted Gauthier to some extent as it became clear that he wasn't going to be a 1C, and Farabee has proven himself to be a 23 year old 1LW. So Drysdale fit a bigger need, although Gauthier is a better prospect (or at least has more upside for now).Weird hypothetical as this is Drysdale’s D+4 and we have more information than we did when he was drafted at 18.
The Flyers don’t even entertain this trade if Gauthier is willing to sign.
they also probably had discounted Gauthier to some extent as it became clear that he wasn't going to be a 1C
“We hope he’s (Gauthier is) going to be a centerman for us, but we know he can also play left wing. [...] The one thing I can tell you is I don’t want to have Cutter Gauthier in a fourth-line role playing for weeks at a time here with the Flyers. To me, it’s really important that he keeps developing, (that) he keeps playing 22-25 minutes a night, that he gets to play center as much as possible."
If both were available in the same draft and the Flyers pick was 5th overall, who would you pick, Gauthier or Drysdale? Wait...if you pick Drysdale, the NHL will throw in a future 2nd rounder. Now who would you pick?
Not worth nothing to note that the Flyers always were the second round pick no matter what. That was baseline requisite as they receive that as compensation had they simply let Gauthier’s right expire.Weird hypothetical as this is Drysdale’s D+4 and we have more information than we did when he was drafted at 18.
The Flyers don’t even entertain this trade if Gauthier is willing to sign.
Just my way of justifying the trade. I’m a Drysdale fan and believe he’s the real deal. Jury’s out on Gauthier until he turns pro but it was a way to save face and fill a weak spot on defense.Weird hypothetical as this is Drysdale’s D+4 and we have more information than we did when he was drafted at 18.
The Flyers don’t even entertain this trade if Gauthier is willing to sign.
"We hope he'll be a centerman for us but we know he can play LW" is a pretty lukewarm endorsement.You made this part up.
Forget the ocean of quotes I could pull up hyping him as a center post-draft. This is Briere this past summer:
But I'm sure, mere months later, leading the WJC in points -- while playing center -- was the death knell for their evaluation and precipitated the trade.
Imagine being dumb enough to threaten unsigned Cutter Gauthier with AHL time at the end of last season when the bottom feeder Flyers were playing forwards like Bellows, Deslauriers, Allison, Laczynski, Lemieux and the soon to be traded with $10.7m worth of retention Kevin Hayes.
That's 5 AHL-level forwards, and another guy the team already knew would not be back under any circumstances.
I wouldn’t argue with any of that. I think this is a case of immovable object, meets, irresistible force, the entitlement version.I think Cutter's attitude of "you have to give me...", would have been a determent to the entire club. We all have already seen what happens when a few inmates run the asylum and we do not need that type of "me" culture in the locker-room. Cutter's attitude and ego would have eventually overshadowed the locker-room and team if he was not able to dictate his roster status and minutes, rather than management. I prefer building a cohesive locker-room culture for players who want to be in it, rather than cater to a singular potential "star" player. Coming out of the "gate" this guy thinks he has the reputation of Bedard or Crosby...when he's probably more closer to a bust-level than either of those 2.
If this is in the ballpark the Flyers made out real well considering the circumstances.Pronman released his top NHL players and prospects under 23 list yesterday…
Quitter was ranked 46th.
Drysdale was ranked 48th.
They were technically on different “tiers”, CG on tier 6 “top of the lineup player” and Drysdale on tier 7 “bubble top and middle of the lineup player”, but pretty close.
It’s obviously just one guy’s opinion, but I thought it was interesting since it’s the first such list in recent years that compares the two talents.
Also, rather humorous, he had the guy everyone wanted with our 2nd FRP, Perreault 45th, Quitter 46th, the guy we allegedly tried to trade Quitter for at the draft (Reinbacher) 47th and the guy we actually traded him for (Drysdale) 48th.
Wait did I skim over something? Did they do this?Imagine being dumb enough to threaten unsigned Cutter Gauthier with AHL time at the end of last season when the bottom feeder Flyers were playing forwards like Bellows, Deslauriers, Allison, Laczynski, Lemieux and the soon to be traded with $10.7m worth of retention Kevin Hayes.
That's 5 AHL-level forwards, and another guy the team already knew would not be back under any circumstances.
May have been discussed already
Hartnell Adds Even More Context to Gauthier Trade Drama
Not directly, but Hartnell (a paid employee) suggested it.Wait did I skim over something? Did they do this?
If this was a pattern then yes, perhaps you’d be correct. But is it?I think Cutter's attitude of "you have to give me...", would have been a determent to the entire club. We all have already seen what happens when a few inmates run the asylum and we do not need that type of "me" culture in the locker-room. Cutter's attitude and ego would have eventually overshadowed the locker-room and team if he was not able to dictate his roster status and minutes, rather than management. I prefer building a cohesive locker-room culture for players who want to be in it, rather than cater to a singular potential "star" player. Coming out of the "gate" this guy thinks he has the reputation of Bedard or Crosby...when he's probably more closer to a bust-level than either of those 2.
Definitely a pot and kettle dynamic in this situation.The whole messaging on this still remains very one sided. All from the Flyers to try to paint themselves in a certain light, and don’t be fooled that the meat they threw to the fanbase wasn’t prepared exactly how they wanted it.
For all we know Cutter saw a decade long dysfunctional franchise that has painted Tortorella as some sort of god. Saw that, and bailed.
Does Drysdale skip his ELC as well, or are contracts ignored to maximize the point you are trying to make?If both were available in the same draft and the Flyers pick was 5th overall, who would you pick, Gauthier or Drysdale? Wait...if you pick Drysdale, the NHL will throw in a future 2nd rounder. Now who would you pick?
If this was a pattern then yes, perhaps you’d be correct. But is it?
Haven’t heard a single negative word from any current or ex coaches/teammates. And that stuff usually gets out. Heck, we heard whispers about Michkov being a bad teammate… Ithink those were BS, but still the point is not even a salacious rumor about cutter has made its way into the public eye.
All I see here is a guy who believes in himself, wants to get his career started and get closer to earning big $. He was going to be playing for a team that’s in a self proclaimed rebuild, lappy’s “development” of players in the AHL has been less than thrilling (to put it mildly) and Torts had shown a tendency to yo-yo prospects between the NHL and AHL, which can be horrendous for development.
I don’t see the big deal with giving your top prospect (at the time) a guaranteed opportunity to start the year.
If he isn’t ready and he’s embarrassing himself come December, you cross that bridge when you get to it. No different than the decision the organization is weighing right now with Brink’s terrible play of late.