Prospect Info: Florian Xhekaj

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
After reflection on the past few days I hadn't realized how many spots will open up on the Habs' bottom six in the next two years.

Gallagher, Anderson, Armia, Newhook, Evans, Dvorak could potentially all be gone. That's a lot of roster spots.

Most of the young players we discuss won't make it. That's inevitable. But if they're healthy, they'll almost certainly get legitimate opportunities to make it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Levard
After reflection on the past few days I hadn't realized how many spots will open up on the Habs' bottom six in the next two years.

Gallagher, Anderson, Armia, Newhook, Evans, Dvorak could potentially all be gone. That's a lot of roster spots.

Most of the young players we discuss won't make it. That's inevitable. But if they're healthy, they'll almost certainly get legitimate opportunities to make it.
Maybe, but next year already looks bleak for forward newcomers even if Hughes trades away Evans, Armia and Dvorak.

Demidov has a SPOT in the top-6, but after that, there's Laine, Dach and Newhook to try to spot in there.

Whoever doesn't slot in fills out the remaining spot on wing for the third line after HEINEMAN, IMO, and another player is over the required players to fill the roster.

Anderson and Gallagher are likely still here until the trade deadline, at least, in two years.

Will Newhook push Anderson or Gallagher to the 13th forward role?

Where are all these opportunities for prospects? At C in the bottom-6? Obviously, Beck gets a spot at C, whether on the 3rd or 4th line.

If both Evans and Dvorak are gone, we have a problem, Houston, one that forces Newhook into a role at C on the 3rd or 4th line.
 
Maybe, but next year already looks bleak for forward newcomers even if Hughes trades away Evans, Armia and Dvorak.

Demidov has a SPOT in the top-6, but after that, there's Laine, Dach and Newhook to try to spot in there.

Whoever doesn't slot in fills out the remaining spot on wing for the third line after HEINEMAN, IMO, and another player is over the required players to fill the roster.

Anderson and Gallagher are likely still here until the trade deadline, at least, in two years.

Will Newhook push Anderson or Gallagher to the 13th forward role?

Where are all these opportunities for prospects? At C in the bottom-6? Obviously, Beck gets a spot at C, whether on the 3rd or 4th line.

If both Evans and Dvorak are gone, we have a problem, Houston, one that forces Newhook into a role at C on the 3rd or 4th line.

You mentioned Houston, they might open up another spot via an expansion draft. Not next year but soon.

After that there's always injuries. The Habs have comparatively few injuries this year, but most years you will see 2, 3, or 4 forward prospects get a shot that way.
 
It helps that there will be several spots available on the Habs' bottom six, so in principle both Tuch and Xhekaj could make it.

But I'm surprised by your preference due to one admittedly superficial distinction, Xhekaj is more than two years younger than Tuch, yet he has superior production. Normally, that would imply he's ahead.
Those spots on the bottom-6 might not be available for another two full years, so there is still time for development...
 
  • Like
Reactions: L4br3cqu3
The distinction I referenced is hardly superficial.

Tuch will never be high scorer. It’s not his ‘game’. He’s a high energy, physical, defensively responsible, disruptive player whose superior skating ability helps raise the speed median of any team he plays on. Any offence production Tuch can contribute is a bonus.

While Tuch already has NHL level skating, it remains to be seen if Xhekaj will ever attain that same level. If the level of Xhekaj’s skating ability remain static or only improves marginally, he will never be an impactful NHL player.

As in most cases: it’s always about the skating.
You are consistent in that argument.

There are exceptions to the rule, especially with scorers (Robitaille is always the best example, followed Brett Hull) and you then get the elite speedsters who produce little like Mete, but, yes, if you can't skate with the big boys, your impact is usually hampered at the NHL level.
 
You are consistent in that argument.

There are exceptions to the rule, especially with scorers (Robitaille is always the best example, followed Brett Hull) and you then get the elite speedsters who produce little like Mete, but, yes, if you can't skate with the big boys, your impact is usually hampered at the NHL level.
No question. But I think it is poor strategy to base a re-building / personnel strategy on a hoped for exception.

In my long association with this game the immutable fact is that the single, most important distinction between house league and rep players; “A” and “AAA” players ; Junior A and CHL players and AHL and NHL players is their comparative skating abilities.

There are, of course, exceptions but I prefer to be guided in my decision making by pursuing probabilities rather than possibilities. Hence my position, that as of today, Tuch, who already has NHL level skating ( plus other positive traits such as size and physicality) will probably make the NHL before the more ‘skillful’ Florian Xhekaj.

I, like many here, was curious about this kid when we drafted him. I read those all too superficial scouting reports that depicted Florian as a large, rugged, and physical player who projected as a possible bottom 6 forward in the NHL. He was regarded as Xhekaj ‘Lite’.

Then I started to follow him in Branford and realized that this kid was no thug, but possessed above average straightforward speed and hockey skills. He was even playing on the Bulldogs powe play. Heck, he was even running the power play from the right point position. After watching Florian play for a couple of weeks I boldly suggested that Team Canada officials should have this kid on their radar as a player who could provide speed, skill and size to Canada’s WJC entry instead of the smallish, slow plugs that they usually seemed so enchanted with. I thought that Florian had more than enough skating, size and skill to be a factor ( certainly a physically intimidating one) against players of his own age group.

It is good to see Florian starting to flourish against pro level competition in the AHL. Its also instructive to see the Laval coaching staff place greater in game responsibilities on this young player.

Nevertheless, unless Florian improves his quickness , agility and edge work, he will not be able create the time and space he needs to flash very underestimated hockey skills at the next level. The goal he scored last game from what appeared to be an impossible angle, was no fluke. He makes multiple, creative plays every game. He sees the ice well. Florian has now caught up to the speed and pace of the AHL. He’s becoming more noticeable. Florian is no mere bottom line fill-in. He’s becoming a key player for the Rocket.

I think his upward trajectory will continue. While it probably not happen this year or even next year, this kid will be playing in Montreal and will be playing an important role.

Have I ever been wrong before?
 
No question. But I think it is poor strategy to base a re-building / personnel strategy on a hoped for exception.

In my long association with this game the immutable fact is that the single, most important distinction between house league and rep players; “A” and “AAA” players ; Junior A and CHL players and AHL and NHL players is their comparative skating abilities.

There are, of course, exceptions but I prefer to be guided in my decision making by pursuing probabilities rather than possibilities. Hence my position, that as of today, Tuch, who already has NHL level skating ( plus other positive traits such as size and physicality) will probably make the NHL before the more ‘skillful’ Florian Xhekaj.

I, like many here, was curious about this kid when we drafted him. I read those all too superficial scouting reports that depicted Florian as a large, rugged, and physical player who projected as a possible bottom 6 forward in the NHL. He was regarded as Xhekaj ‘Lite’.

Then I started to follow him in Branford and realized that this kid was no thug, but possessed above average straightforward speed and hockey skills. He was even playing on the Bulldogs powe play. Heck, he was even running the power play from the right point position. After watching Florian play for a couple of weeks I boldly suggested that Team Canada officials should have this kid on their radar as a player who could provide speed, skill and size to Canada’s WJC entry instead of the smallish, slow plugs that they usually seemed so enchanted with. I thought that Florian had more than enough skating, size and skill to be a factor ( certainly a physically intimidating one) against players of his own age group.

It is good to see Florian starting to flourish against pro level competition in the AHL. Its also instructive to see the Laval coaching staff place greater in game responsibilities on this young player.

Nevertheless, unless Florian improves his quickness , agility and edge work, he will not be able create the time and space he needs to flash very underestimated hockey skills at the next level. The goal he scored last game from what appeared to be an impossible angle, was no fluke. He makes multiple, creative plays every game. He sees the ice well. Florian has now caught up to the speed and pace of the AHL. He’s becoming more noticeable. Florian is no mere bottom line fill-in. He’s becoming a key player for the Rocket.

I think his upward trajectory will continue. While it probably not happen this year or even next year, this kid will be playing in Montreal and will be playing an important role.

Have I ever been wrong before?
Of course you have, but sports forums have no oracles of truth on them, TBH.

It's your evaluation of things, whether it is professional, amateur, or whatever. Room for error is prevalent in such evaluations when it comes to projecting an 18-year old, a 19-year old, a 20-year old or another youngster since, in a player's development, progression can occur at varying times, sometimes never, always depending on the level at which the player is playing.

Some okay AHLers go on to become 30-goal scorers in the NHL. Other top-of-the league AHLers, year after year, never make the jump to the NHL and stick at that level.

I'm more concerned about processing speed than skating speed once we reach some level of skating that, Imo, is a minimum.

If you're not fast enough to burn by opposing Ds, but can spot a free line mate regularly, plus use them on the fly to give a speed advantage over flat-footed Ds, then trail in on the play in support, adding defensive insulation in case of a turnover, that can be pretty good, assuming you aren't skating in molasses to begin with.

Beyond that, owning a decent shot, making plays in tight spaces, a proficiency at finding passing and shooting lanes, an ability to win puck battles, good vision of the ice around you and good hockey IQ to underscore developing patterns and future player positioning could combine to help you become a helluva player.

You can't be a pylon, though, but skating issues can be comparatively overcome with higher compete level, positioning and, especially, anticipation.

Mind you, some pylons like Sheldon Souray did manage to make a lot of money in the NHL, but that's more reaction and sideways mobility as a handicap that made him a pylon.

Also, in a race, the faster player may well be the first one to pull the foot off the gas.

In football, as a full back, I would burn most opponents in the first 10, 20, 30 and, even, 40 yards, but, if you kept going, you might catch up in the remaining yards to the goal line.

Not that the 10-yard gain or greater isn't any good, but I prefer it had been a touchdown each time I had gotten the early lead on an opponent.
 
You are consistent in that argument.

There are exceptions to the rule, especially with scorers (Robitaille is always the best example, followed Brett Hull) and you then get the elite speedsters who produce little like Mete, but, yes, if you can't skate with the big boys, your impact is usually hampered at the NHL level.
elite speedsters who produce little , we already have one of those, Newhook.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rapala

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad