StatsNightHero
Registered User
- Mar 25, 2014
- 132
- 0
Does anybody else think the league's CBA is flawed by the differences in income tax in te league? If every team is limited to the same Salary Cap would it not make sense for the Cap to be adjusted in each market to account for the differences in income tax? Big markets such as Toronto are essentially paying for other teams players through revenue sharing and for those fans to get much cheaper tickets for a very similar experience. Players signing in Ontario lose a much larger percentage of their salary to tax (a factor that effects player contract demands) then those who sign in Florida (among others). I know this is a problem that extends beyond Toronto and includes other big markets but as a Leafs fan this is a legitimate piss off to me. Leafs fans pay more for tickets then those in Florida (and as you all know, it's not even close), and in return we get higher contract demands so the players can bring the same amount of money home after taxes. Another option (probably a legal mess) could be to subjugate all players in the league to the same income tax. The cap and revenue sharing is designed to put all the teams in the league on a level playing field and right now that is not the case. It's pure exploitation of this market and fan base considering we pay for other teams to get players for cheap.