GDT: Flames vs. Golden Knights, 8:00 PM MDT (2:00 AM GMT)

Here you go. Sorry it's Francis, but it's all I could find.


Wow, that's absurd.

The annoying thing about the Utah one was that the spatial resolution was just not good enough to determine the edge of the puck and the line. It seems likely that it is in if you could just make out the edges.

And the one on the left is suddenly higher resolution... but that frame is clearly not the one where the puck reaches its furthest point, so this time we're held back by temporal resolution.

Who do I blame for this? Bettman? Musk? Gates?
 
  • Love
Reactions: Boomstick
Wow, that's absurd.

The annoying thing about the Utah one was that the spatial resolution was just not good enough to determine the edge of the puck and the line. It seems likely that it is in if you could just make out the edges.

And the one on the left is suddenly higher resolution... but that frame is clearly not the one where the puck reaches its furthest point, so this time we're held back by temporal resolution.

Who do I blame for this? Bettman? Musk? Gates?
It's hard to believe it happened twice this week. You have to remember the camera is in the back of the net too, so there could still be some space in front of the puck, but the puck is hiding it because the camera can't look over the puck. I dunno man, so frustrating and heartbreaking.
 
It's hard to believe it happened twice this week. You have to remember the camera is in the back of the net too, so there could still be some space in front of the puck, but the puck is hiding it because the camera can't look over the puck. I dunno man, so frustrating and heartbreaking.
Not anymore. They put them in the crossbar because of- you guessed it- the Flames.

1743917460188.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boomstick
Wow, that's absurd.

The annoying thing about the Utah one was that the spatial resolution was just not good enough to determine the edge of the puck and the line. It seems likely that it is in if you could just make out the edges.

And the one on the left is suddenly higher resolution... but that frame is clearly not the one where the puck reaches its furthest point, so this time we're held back by temporal resolution.

Who do I blame for this? Bettman? Musk? Gates?
My understanding from reading a few different GDTs is the only reason it was even reviewed was because f it crossed the line then the Flames could use a coaches challenge to challenge the ruling of no-goal de to goaltender interference.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boomstick
My understanding from reading a few different GDTs is the only reason it was even reviewed was because f it crossed the line then the Flames could use a coaches challenge to challenge the ruling of no-goal de to goaltender interference.
Yeah, I only just saw the actual full clip. They have to make that ruling before they can allow the Flames to do the Coach's Challenge.

I've actually seen NHL games where they mess up the order on that. Can't remember if it featured the Flames, but they went back and forth from the coach, to the phone, to the mic, to the phone, to the coach and then ret-conned a coach's challenge.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boomstick
Andersson with another -2, he was brutal on that second goal. Stage his next season and ship when his value sky high (1st PP mins, play him vs 3rd and 4th lines).
 
Can someone explain why we had 4 skaters on the ice on that Vegas GWG goal?? Were we on PP and still lost?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad