Boomstick
Registered User
Good thing we didn't have a puck go over the line and get overturned again, oh wait. Check.
Weegar is our best player outside of WolfPulling hard for ya'll but that Weeger is rotten.Kid coming from OHL will be a God send for you.
What did I miss?Good thing we didn't have a puck go over the line and get overturned again, oh wait. Check.
He is slow and sloppy.Kadri your best player.Parekh kid will be a stud.You guys have some good ones coming.Weegar is our best player outside of Wolf
Hopefully Dallas is angry from that horrible game they played todayHorrible bounce, but that's a huge point to take from this game.
Need Dallas to do the job tomorrow, and this point then allows us a bit more breathing room going forward.
Remember the Utah game that the puck didn't cross the line allegedly? Exact same thing tonight. Coleman.What did I miss?
Here you go. Sorry it's Francis, but it's all I could find.What did I miss?
Here you go. Sorry it's Francis, but it's all I could find.
Here you go. Sorry it's Francis, but it's all I could find.
It's hard to believe it happened twice this week. You have to remember the camera is in the back of the net too, so there could still be some space in front of the puck, but the puck is hiding it because the camera can't look over the puck. I dunno man, so frustrating and heartbreaking.Wow, that's absurd.
The annoying thing about the Utah one was that the spatial resolution was just not good enough to determine the edge of the puck and the line. It seems likely that it is in if you could just make out the edges.
And the one on the left is suddenly higher resolution... but that frame is clearly not the one where the puck reaches its furthest point, so this time we're held back by temporal resolution.
Who do I blame for this? Bettman? Musk? Gates?
Not anymore. They put them in the crossbar because of- you guessed it- the Flames.It's hard to believe it happened twice this week. You have to remember the camera is in the back of the net too, so there could still be some space in front of the puck, but the puck is hiding it because the camera can't look over the puck. I dunno man, so frustrating and heartbreaking.
I thought I heard someone this week say it's not there anymore, because the goalie was always impeding the view. Maybe I'm wrong lol.Not anymore. They put them in the crossbar because of- you guessed it- the Flames.
View attachment 1007374
Dude. Don't watch the game winning goal. You may lose your shit.I tried to stay awake, but I'd been awake 36 hours and succumbed. Glad to see we got a point.
My understanding from reading a few different GDTs is the only reason it was even reviewed was because f it crossed the line then the Flames could use a coaches challenge to challenge the ruling of no-goal de to goaltender interference.Wow, that's absurd.
The annoying thing about the Utah one was that the spatial resolution was just not good enough to determine the edge of the puck and the line. It seems likely that it is in if you could just make out the edges.
And the one on the left is suddenly higher resolution... but that frame is clearly not the one where the puck reaches its furthest point, so this time we're held back by temporal resolution.
Who do I blame for this? Bettman? Musk? Gates?
Yeah, I only just saw the actual full clip. They have to make that ruling before they can allow the Flames to do the Coach's Challenge.My understanding from reading a few different GDTs is the only reason it was even reviewed was because f it crossed the line then the Flames could use a coaches challenge to challenge the ruling of no-goal de to goaltender interference.
The OT started with the Knights on the PP. There were no whistles from the start of OT to the goal. 30 seconds in, Bahl got out of the box and they skated 4-on-4 for the rest.Can someone explain why we had 4 skaters on the ice on that Vegas GWG goal?? Were we on PP and still lost?