I mean I could understand the desire if the Flames dominated sure, but in reality that’s righ up there with all of Ward’s decisions this season.To the oilers forum to troll I guess boyos.
This is why I'm kind of surprised at the melt down after the game. Sure, get down 2-0 off of a shitty Markstrom play, but the team around him is rallying and applying strong pressure. They even get into the realm of a comeback off a great goal by Mangiapane (who would've though entering the zone with speed was a GOOD thing). Then it is immediately might be a defensive break down that is also a good example of how a player losing their coverage at the top of the zone and coming back down with speed is good (though I also give Monahan fault for committing to Pettersson despite Valimaki having a better angle, and that anyone who is going to make you pay isn't from the half-wall, it'll be the guy he passes to). Then you get to the 4th goal against and it's just bad all around on Tkachuk in a way that's inidcative of his play this entire. A weak breakout play that leads to a turnover, and the Canucks are able to get chance after chance while he is slowly getting up to go and barely attempt to back check while his man goes in and wires it. 5th goal is a result of trying to force too much offence for the prior situations imo.This was a hard game to watch, but ironically not the worst hockey the Flames have played. They just made mistakes at the end of the second which rendered all of the positives as meaningless.
This was a hard game to watch, but ironically not the worst hockey the Flames have played. They just made mistakes at the end of the second which rendered all of the positives as meaningless.
You're giving Ward way too much credit.I can't help but think that there's some weird method to that madness that Ward is deploying. Like he goes into the series saying there's no bad teams in the division after the Canucks get spanked badly by Toronto and Montreal. His main criticisms about losses were often about giving an F or not playing up to a certain intensity. Weirdly, while the comments make sense while I fume at the end result, when my head cools, I don't generally feel that intensity or his other comments are the biggest problem. So somehow, he's looking at something different and using different metrics on purpose, or some of you guys are right and he's just bad.
In the Vancouver match up, it was almost like he was relishing in the opportunity to see and learn like a mad scientist if the Flames can win with their hands tied behind their back because he knows it's not even going to be close if the hands aren't tied. The Flames must work for every win and can't coast to victory. He sets the handicap close, so there should always be an opportunity to eke out the win in his paper simulation.
Thanks @Mazatt for tracking those 3rd period lines. Like you mention, I kinda had an idea he was doing funny things on purpose, but after seeing it in black and white, it's still kinda weird and odd and almost unbelievable to see. It's not like he's fixated on bad lines like Gully. You could look at that data and wonder if he's literally inventing bad lines on purpose to test. Like a person who gets 0% on a multiple choice quiz of 20 questions so he had to know the answers to get all the questions wrong on purpose. Like forcing the team to create lots of video of failures they can learn from, vs a ton of video of nifty easy plays?
Ward's definitely giving the lines a couple chances to try things or something, but he's also seemingly definitely blending the lines a few times during the period as well to see if he can luck into something/test several theories out or something. I don't get WTF Markstrom was doing though.
If my weird theory is correct and Ward is indeed testing something crazy, I wonder if he will suddenly start steam rolling teams once they start falling to injury line juggling and possibly even Covid quarantine line juggling. Maybe that's his crazy idea and he's planning to get a crazy advantage via a predicted league wide man games lost. So he's getting a head start by by testing crazy combos now and getting a few laps ahead in the marathon?
He is a 58 year old rookie head coach whose claim to fame is being a power play genius AND coaching Lucic when Lucic was great. I am not sure why we keep thinking he is going to get this team to commit.I can't help but think that there's some weird method to that madness that Ward is deploying. Like he goes into the series saying there's no bad teams in the division after the Canucks get spanked badly by Toronto and Montreal. His main criticisms about losses were often about giving an F or not playing up to a certain intensity. Weirdly, while the comments make sense while I fume at the end result, when my head cools, I don't generally feel that intensity or his other comments are the biggest problem. So somehow, he's looking at something different and using different metrics on purpose, or some of you guys are right and he's just bad.
In the Vancouver match up, it was almost like he was relishing in the opportunity to see and learn like a mad scientist if the Flames can win with their hands tied behind their back because he knows it's not even going to be close if the hands aren't tied. The Flames must work for every win and can't coast to victory. He sets the handicap close, so there should always be an opportunity to eke out the win in his paper simulation.
Thanks @Mazatt for tracking those 3rd period lines. Like you mention, I kinda had an idea he was doing funny things on purpose, but after seeing it in black and white, it's still kinda weird and odd and almost unbelievable to see. It's not like he's fixated on bad lines like Gully. You could look at that data and wonder if he's literally inventing bad lines on purpose to test. Like a person who gets 0% on a multiple choice quiz of 20 questions so he had to know the answers to get all the questions wrong on purpose. Like forcing the team to create lots of video of failures they can learn from, vs a ton of video of nifty easy plays?
Ward's definitely giving the lines a couple chances to try things or something, but he's also seemingly definitely blending the lines a few times during the period as well to see if he can luck into something/test several theories out or something. I don't get WTF Markstrom was doing though.
If my weird theory is correct and Ward is indeed testing something crazy, I wonder if he will suddenly start steam rolling teams once they start falling to injury line juggling and possibly even Covid quarantine line juggling. Maybe that's his crazy idea and he's planning to get a crazy advantage via a predicted league wide man games lost. So he's getting a head start by by testing crazy combos now and getting a few laps ahead in the marathon?
I can't help but think that there's some weird method to that madness that Ward is deploying. Like he goes into the series saying there's no bad teams in the division after the Canucks get spanked badly by Toronto and Montreal. His main criticisms about losses were often about giving an F or not playing up to a certain intensity. Weirdly, while the comments make sense while I fume at the end result, when my head cools, I don't generally feel that intensity or his other comments are the biggest problem. So somehow, he's looking at something different and using different metrics on purpose, or some of you guys are right and he's just bad.
In the Vancouver match up, it was almost like he was relishing in the opportunity to see and learn like a mad scientist if the Flames can win with their hands tied behind their back because he knows it's not even going to be close if the hands aren't tied. The Flames must work for every win and can't coast to victory. He sets the handicap close, so there should always be an opportunity to eke out the win in his paper simulation.
Thanks @Mazatt for tracking those 3rd period lines. Like you mention, I kinda had an idea he was doing funny things on purpose, but after seeing it in black and white, it's still kinda weird and odd and almost unbelievable to see. It's not like he's fixated on bad lines like Gully. You could look at that data and wonder if he's literally inventing bad lines on purpose to test. Like a person who gets 0% on a multiple choice quiz of 20 questions so he had to know the answers to get all the questions wrong on purpose. Like forcing the team to create lots of video of failures they can learn from, vs a ton of video of nifty easy plays?
Ward's definitely giving the lines a couple chances to try things or something, but he's also seemingly definitely blending the lines a few times during the period as well to see if he can luck into something/test several theories out or something. I don't get WTF Markstrom was doing though.
If my weird theory is correct and Ward is indeed testing something crazy, I wonder if he will suddenly start steam rolling teams once they start falling to injury line juggling and possibly even Covid quarantine line juggling. Maybe that's his crazy idea and he's planning to get a crazy advantage via a predicted league wide man games lost. So he's getting a head start by by testing crazy combos now and getting a few laps ahead in the marathon?
Why did Tkachuk get 4 more minutes than Gaudreau last night? Took my family for vacation so missed the last 2 periods but I feel like if you're trailing you probably want 13 out there as much as possible?
Tkachuk sucks but if you rewatch the game, Johnny didnt come to play.
Bennett has the offensive IQ of a 4th liner. Make all the bs justifications you want he just doesn’t have the IQ to be anything more than a 4C in this league. He can have good games occasionally and be in the top-9 but he’s never been consistent enough to warrant anything more and saying it’s because his tendencies are to pass forward is a massive cop out. The guy isn’t good offensively any way u slice it. 5+ years of seeing offensive possessions die on his stick because he’s god awful in transition. Either throws it at the net blindly or tries to beat his man by going through him which never ever works. Absolutely no flow to his offensive game and can’t make plays off the rushBennett as a winger doesn't work because his instinct is to pass forward, not make drop passes, and if no one is ahead of him he doesn't want to slow the pace down. As a center, he is able to do exactly that, but as a winger he gets caught up ice. This is the sort of detail our coaching staffs are oblivious to.
Sure, but he's been the better player all season and has consistently gotten less ice time. Tkachuk is averaging 1:08 more ES TOI per game. Gaudreau is 22nd amongst all left wings and 70th amongst all forwards in ES TOI, why limit the ice time for an elite player like him?
It just doesn't make sense to not use your best left winger like he's your best left winger.
We didn't play too awful. All it took was a 30 second meltdown and Vancouver capitalized. I feel this weekend series with the Oilers will determine our season or close to it.. If we can get 3 or 4 points out of it then we push forward. The Oilers played well against the Jets the other night, but didn't look good at all last night, as it felt like Winnipeg was in there zone non stop, so they aren't playing like world beaters or anything right now.