Well, it's not like he hasn't been. The last few years, our players have piled up a lot of negative +/-s game in and game out, and it resulted in allowing way more goals than we scored. This year, a lot of our players have significantly increased their +/-s per game, and it's resulted in outscoring our opposition much more often.
He's playing 25+ mins a night and is on pace for 12g 38a and 48pts all while being north of +30.
So yeah...
You should compare him to Kevan Miller at +18 instead.
Brodie actually contributes on the scoreboard having 8 goals and 24 assists in 54 games
Brodie reminds me a lot of Duncan Keith.
It's okay, we also remmeber the Tanev > Brodie arguments too
I see nothing wrong with that argument.
Tanev isn't +26. That's what's wrong.
In all seriousness, as much as Tanev has been impressive and their respective careers have followed similar trajectories, I don't know if there is a single argument you could make in favour of Tanev which doesn't apply more strongly to Brodie. Brodie plays the toughest minutes on the team (with Giordano, of course), has great possession numbers relative to his team, and chips in above .5 ppg.
I'm just saying you can make an argument. I know Calgary fans think Brodie is better and Canucks fans think Tanev is better. I don't think it's laughable like the guy I quoted suggests.
Brodie is obviously better offensively, no doubt, but Tanev can't really put up numbers when he doesn't play the power-play.
Tanev plays the same tough minutes Brodie does. IMO, Tanev is better defensively.
He is comparing him to schultz due to the fact that he was a plus 50 once. It just goes to show how flawed +/- is.
I know and I'm pointing out how Brodie's +/- has a lot to do with his own contributions rather than a 124 point offensive-powerhouse team completely inflating his +/-
Why was he drafted so low? He's average sized, great skater, good IQ- was it a case of him just being a not so great that got amazing development?
Is Kevan Miller's plus minus due to his own contributions then? I honestly don't know. Never watched the guy
Why was he drafted so low? He's average sized, great skater, good IQ- was it a case of him just being a not so great that got amazing development?
It is very surprising because his play has gone downhill in the last month+ and I see him being the direct cause for a considerable number of GA.
I watch a lot of Flames games
That's really over exaggerated. He had a poor game against the Pens (the whole team did) but otherwise he's been playing well consistently. His point totals have cooled a bit, but his positional and defensive play has not gone downhill.
He has been turning the puck over a lot in the defensive and neutral zones lately. The San Jose game had a half dozen of them.