hockeywiz542
Registered User
- May 26, 2008
- 15,947
- 5,008
We don't agree and quit pretending we do. Under the deal that was just canceled the Flames are the only ones profiting from the arena so should be paying everything - including taxes to the city. I don't know why people think that Flames owners should be entitled to rip off taxpayers the way this agreement would have allowed.Exactly, thanks for agreeing. The real value is in the building and separate events, as well as the inflex of development dollars, which is why the city should pay their fair share. The city of Calgary has no intention of taking a step backwards. It's just a ruse, wasting time and costing taxpayers more in the end.
The City has been wrong before. More than once, I bet.The City didn't want CalgaryNEXT either.
They were really wrong when they help negotiate and sign the arena deal in the first place. That was their dumbest move.The City has been wrong before. More than once, I bet.
Found the extra money guys.
"The Endy Dome"
Found the extra money guys.
"The Endy Dome"
Yeah, but that's not as funny.It would be Clearbanc
The City has been wrong before. More than once, I bet.
I agree. It would not be surprising if Edwards, especially given his background, was hesitant to jump into a longterm investment with the city. I feel as though it could be a sign of things to come, with investors choosing to "move past" Calgary, if you will. Bitting the hand that feeds you is never a good way to start your tenure, especially during a climate emergency and pandemic.I think CSEC was looking for an excuse to pull out of the arena deal. ... and they found one.
I imagine they've lost a lot of money in the past couple of years... in fact I imagine they are bleeding money on a daily basis and the near future doesn't look too bright during which construction costs will begin to skyrocket. Right now they probably weren't too excited about spending $300-350m (not counting inflation costs) of their money building a new arena that will take years for them to recoup their costs.
It wouldn't surprise me at all to see them try to renegotiate the whole deal so that it costs them a lot less or to try and resurrect the Calgary Next proposal which was a lot more favorable to them with regards to surrounding land development and future revenues.
As for people shitting on Mayor Gondek... she is only one vote of fifteen. Her vote counts for no more or no less than the votes of the fourteen city councillors.
With regards to everyone's favorite ex-pat resident Swiss billionaire Murray Edwards ....his vote carries a hell of a lot more weight than the individual votes of the other three minority owners. Murray's fingerprints are all over this pullout. Gondek is just a small cog in the wheel.
I used to be totally for the new arena development but there comes a point where you just get sick and tired of billionaire rich guys constantly demanding more and more. I think they've over played their hand this time. f*** 'em.Fine with me. Put the money into downtown revitalization and the green line.
I really do not GAF to give Edwards and co any more public money at this point.
I used to be totally for the new arena development but there comes a point where you just get sick and tired of billionaire rich guys constantly demanding more and more. I think they've over played their hand this time. f*** 'em.
Exactly! Why spend 3/4 of a billion on a B grade barn that you'll regret for the next 30-40 years.Good, Calgary Next is back on the table.