Ruzicka is 9th for TOI after two period for Flames forwards data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/495f1/495f185fc1f2d2bd459ec9ded3ca2eb67b513d95" alt="laugh :laugh: :laugh:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/495f1/495f185fc1f2d2bd459ec9ded3ca2eb67b513d95" alt="laugh :laugh: :laugh:"
Never been a fan of 3 on 3. You are right it is a joke. But 4 on 4 just think of the opportunities and potential goals scored and end to end rushes like B Orr,G Perreault used to entertain the masses withLet's just play soccer with one forward and one goalie per team then. Overtime 3 on 3 is already a joke.
I think the Flames found themselves a good oneRuzicka is 9th for TOI after two period for Flames forwards![]()
Personally I think Ice hockey already has enough goals. 3v3 is fun as a tie breaker, but if we took away a skater permanently you'd turn it into basketball on ice and I'd very quickly lose interestFlames and Panthers game looks pretty good. Just wondering as a hockey fan how many would like to see 1 fewer skaters aside permanently. I think the game gets to clogged up and the players need more room to skate into open ice and create more one on one opportunities. Could have more goals and more sleepless nights for the netminders and isn't that all its about
But NHL rinks aren't built to be able widen the dimensions except for the old Saddledome and maybe one or two others. Back in the Olden days the NHA, had 6 skaters aside when the NHL was formed(1917) out of the NHA they did away with the rover position or 6th skater and played with 5 skaters aside. The players then wore little equipment and were on average 150-165 lbs and not much more until later when the behemoths took over. And we have pretty much behemoths in goal on every(NHL) team. And it kills excitement these goaltenders that don't even have to "move" to make a save. Where the players have to score into an area barely 1 inch by 3 inches. Scorers need to be sharpshooters, marksman, while the tender needs to be lumbering,giant ogre. Well hockey needs to go 4 on 4 to show the World,its the Greatest game on Earth bar none! Fastest by far,Most difficult to play and master by far. Takes the most talent and skill but more than that you have to have a hockey IQ and be able to think the game and platitudes go on and onI'd rather they widen the rinks by 6 feet. Give a little more room without changing the game all that much.
He still sucks ass with his tag, glad he scored thoughBLAKE THE SNAKE
I'm confused. What problem do you think this solves?But NHL rinks aren't built to be able widen the dimensions except for the old Saddledome and maybe one or two others. Back in the Olden days the NHA, had 6 skaters aside when the NHL was formed(1917) out of the NHA they did away with the rover position or 6th skater and played with 5 skaters aside. The players then wore little equipment and were on average 150-165 lbs and not much more until later when the behemoths took over. And we have pretty much behemoths in goal on every(NHL) team. And it kills excitement these goaltenders that don't even have to "move" to make a save. Where the players have to score into an area barely 1 inch by 3 inches. Scorers need to be sharpshooters, marksman, while the tender needs to be lumbering,giant ogre. Well hockey needs to go 4 on 4 to show the World,its the Greatest game on Earth bar none! Fastest by far,Most difficult to play and master by far. Takes the most talent and skill but more than that you have to have a hockey IQ and be able to think the game and platitudes go on and on