- Sep 30, 2016
- 8,746
- 22,452
Actually, Mrs. Jetson's response was "Hey, if she was that hot, why are you complaining?"
Unfortunately you can’t stop me. I have no life and futile efforts are my jamNot trying to offend anyone going over the games highlights and looking to explain why certain goals went in, but that's a futile effort. We shit kicked the flames for 60 minutes and they stole a game with a hot goaltender. You cant really dissect that.
So both goals were not great. His other games he has been better. So his high standards makes me expect more from him.That feels a bit harsh. The PP goal was probably saveable, but it was a shot from inside and below the face off dots off of a royal road pass. That’s got to be considered high danger in the numbers, and to my eyes, looked like a damn hard shot to save. The deflection was just stupid and I don’t even want to watch it again to see if he was over commiting to the orginal shot
Yeah, but it’s short side.Didn't it ring off the post?
You might be onto something. Still a small sample size so we will see how it plays out.View attachment 963481
The only thing i can think of is physological. When one would normally not admit.
They are not as worried to attack and to gamble if Helly is in net.
They can play the system, no disrespect to Comrie but they might (the team) focuses more on helping him — preventive. And then it doesn’t help the team as that is not their strength.
Just MPO
Anyways go Jets GO
Cup or bust!!!!
imo that speaks to a larger problem in this particular case it’s on goalie.Stan over commits first of all... this is a result of his footspeed - he overcompensates and basically plays man coverage on the pk instead of his zone
Our pk is based on aggressive gap control... stan just consistently backs up too much and doesnt have the footspeed to challenge - thats never going to change
Yes its a nice pass but by no means a play of the week
Vegas lost to Blackhawks(!?) and Canucks have a 3-0 lead against Oilers.well at least dallas lost and wild are down 3 with 3 to go
Okay, otherworldly may be over selling it lolStan over commits first of all... this is a result of his footspeed - he overcompensates and basically plays man coverage on the pk instead of his zone
Our pk is based on aggressive gap control... stan just consistently backs up too much and doesnt have the footspeed to challenge - thats never going to change
Yes its a nice pass but by no means a play of the week
imo that speaks to a larger problem in this particular case it’s on goalie.
Yep I said it spoke to a larger issue, but it doesn’t make Comrie blameless he did not, not stop it to teach a lesson. Also mistake is noted by coach either way I’m sure it’s just not talked bout here. As I’m sure they spend hours breaking down film not watch it once like we do.If Comrie stops that, Stanley's mistake is ignored and repeated in another game. Just because the goalie should've had it doesn't mean there aren't other issues to look at.
Well, that game sucked.
But at least the hottie in front of me kept standing up to dance & shake her behind every once in a while, so it wasn't all bad...
Probably, go ahead and get him turned on, I'm the one that will benefit.What did your wife think?
Stan overcommits to the guy closest to him - rather than staying in his position... so he has a real tendency to 'drift' - I think a big part of it is that he doesn't have the speed to close so if he feels he's got a guy to cover, he focuses on that...Okay, otherworldly may be over selling it lol
Point being, he found a seam while being appropriately pressured and as a result earned he teammate a good look. It could have been less good if Stan was more agile, sure, but there was also other blame to go around.
I’m not sure I particularly agree or see the relevance of the first two paragraphs in this scenario. Not sure what he over commits to, then the rest is a bit more generic which I guess I tend to broadly agree with but isn’t as applicable here imo.
If Ehlers converts that breakaway goal, I fully believe this game would have turned into a blowout for the Jets...Ehlers was great tonight. If he could finish he would have had a couple. So many great opportunities he created for himself.
It looked to me earlier in the play he was too far to his right and had to scramble back to his left. However, I’m far from an expert on the matter so maybe he as doing his job an Lowry getting boxed out caused the scoring chance.You'll have to let everyone know how a dman should play the gap on a low to high pass from his off side on the PK
I'm hoping you're being sarcastic, but with the anti-stanley bias around here and no emoji, I can't be sure
After re-watchig it, I think it might actually have been a perfectly executed set play (little pick and all on Lowry).It looked to me earlier in the play he was too far to his right and had to scramble back to his left. However, I’m far from an expert on the matter so maybe he as doing his job an Lowry getting boxed out caused the scoring chance.
Basically the point I was trying to make here... if you watch Stan, he gravitates to the nearest player - which in itself is not a bad thing... but its not our PK system - our penalty killers are constantly pressuring the shooter and cutting off lanesIt looked to me earlier in the play he was too far to his right and had to scramble back to his left. However, I’m far from an expert on the matter so maybe he as doing his job an Lowry getting boxed out caused the scoring chance.