Its a little misleading to characterize fiala as a rental though. If any trade involving these types of assets is consummated I'm fairly certain a long term deal will shortly follow.
give actual examples of players getting know top 10 picks in trades and factor into that team control.
Oreilly is better than Fiala and younger than Zfiala when he was traded.
in return he got 2 recent mid 1st round picks, another prospect drafted high in 2 nd ,and a 2nd round pick that today would be a very late 1st. This return was tied to him signing an extension. There was no top 10 pick nor a player drafted in top 10.
even in Eichel trade there was top 10 protection on the 1st.
The trade return on here is not realistic.
even if a long term contract come with it the return us more likeky going to be
1st rounder in mid 20s+ a recent mid/ late 1st on an ELC+ a recent 2nd round picked prospect starting or finished year 1 of an ELC+salaried player. Of course a higher 1st round pick then the prospects are lowered or if the contracted player is better than the prospects are lower. If the pick is a high 2 nd thrn they get better prospects.
in the ROR trade…
ROR player for Grigorenko(12) +Zadorov (16)+ 2nd (31 OA)+ Compher (38)
if Colorado instead on pick #21OA in that draft then the deal likeky woukd have bern something like. Grigirenko+21+Pysyk+ Baptiste/ Bailey ( drafted late 2nd and early 3rd)