Faulk-Broberg Pairing Playing Better Than Parayko-Leddy

Robb_K

Registered User
Apr 26, 2007
21,104
11,287
NordHolandNethrlands
Broberg has looked better than I expected in his first 3 games, seeming to be working well with Faulk (who seems to be healthier than at the end of last season), and is playing a lot less tentatively.
On the other hand, Parayko hasn't looked very energetic, and Leddy has looked "listless", as usual. I'd like to see The Blues find a better shiftmate for Parayko, and the two top pairings play minute totals that are closer to each other (more even).

Unfortunately, I don't think Bannister is going to put a young player on our top pairing with Parayko because none of them are really ready for that yet. And really, from what I've seen of Suter so far, I worry about him playing even on The 3rd pairing. He's so slow, and opposing forwards can skate right around him so easily, he reminds me of The late 1970s and early 1980s, when The Blues were broke and always playing a couple of career AHL veteran defencemen as their 6th and 7th D-men. I also wish we still had Larry Robinson working with The younger D-men coaching on their skills, sand working on their weaknesses. With the players we've got on the NHL roster right now, it's hard to come up with 3 viable pairings to keep the team relatively competitive.

I'm curious to find out what other posters here think of how The Blues' pairings will shake out as this season moves forward.
 

Davimir Tarablad

Registered User
Sep 16, 2015
9,201
12,912
While they've both had a rough start, they're still taking the heavy defensive lifting that allows for the other pairings to thrive. But, in the long term, we definitely need them to play up to their normal standards to succeed.

That said, I would like to eventually see a shift to playing Broberg-Parayko and Leddy-Faulk and have a more balanced approach to the deployment of the pairings.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad